Teams

SoCal/Reznik/65&Over8.0W

2025 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - OC · OC Women 8.0 Weekend

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-18vs OC Laguna Woods - GailWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrea Weinstein / Miki Kasagi vs Elaine van Rensburg / Jean Maroney6-1, 6-0
2025-10-11vs OC Laguna Woods - GailWon 10
W#2 DoublesRandi Reznik / Cynthia Neiman vs Sheryl Leicher / Cheryl Hirtler6-1, 6-3
2025-10-04vs OC Laguna Woods - GailWon 20
W#1 DoublesCynthia Neiman / Cinda Churm vs Sheryl Leicher / Barbara Grom6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan / Andrea Weinstein vs Char Geary / Nasrin Battle6-0, 6-1
2025-09-27vs OC Laguna Woods - GailWon 20
W#2 DoublesMiki Kasagi / Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan vs Char Geary / Sheryl Leicher6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBette Kerhoulas / Susan Hagstrom vs Theresa Kennedy / Nasrin Battle6-1, 7-5
2025-09-20vs OC Laguna Woods - GailWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Hagstrom / Bette Kerhoulas vs Barbara Grom / Nasrin Battle6-2, 6-4
2025-09-13vs OC Laguna Woods - GailWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Hagstrom / Bette Kerhoulas vs Gail Ashbrooke / Sheryl Leicher6-1, 6-3
2025-08-23vs OC Laguna Woods - GailWon 10
W#2 DoublesCynthia Neiman / Bette Kerhoulas vs Jean Maroney / Nasrin Battle6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women 8.0 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Cynthia Neiman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.90
Patti Roeske
published
3.90
Bette Kerhoulas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
Cinda Churm
published 4
3.70
Randi Reznik
published
3.67
Julie Vislay
published
Miki Kasagi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Hagstrom
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Neiman
28W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Patti Roeske
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Bette Kerhoulas
62W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan
149W–69L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Cinda Churm
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Randi Reznik
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Julie Vislay
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
Miki Kasagi
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Hagstrom
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.