Teams

OC Laguna Woods - Gail

2025 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - OC · OC Women 8.0 Weekend

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-18vs SoCal/Reznik/65&Over8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesTheresa Kennedy / Nasrin Battle vs Cheryl Smith / Susan Mayer3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesElaine van Rensburg / Jean Maroney vs Andrea Weinstein / Miki Kasagi1-6, 0-6
2025-10-11vs SoCal/Reznik/65&Over8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Grom / Jean Maroney vs Susan Hagstrom / Julie Vislay2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSheryl Leicher / Cheryl Hirtler vs Randi Reznik / Cynthia Neiman1-6, 3-6
2025-10-04vs SoCal/Reznik/65&Over8.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSheryl Leicher / Barbara Grom vs Cynthia Neiman / Cinda Churm1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTheresa Kennedy / Cheryl Hirtler vs Cheryl Smith / Susan Mayer6-2, 0-0
2025-09-27vs SoCal/Reznik/65&Over8.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Hirtler / Barbara Grom vs Katie Guerrero / Julie Vislay6-7, 1-6
2025-09-20vs SoCal/Reznik/65&Over8.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Grom / Nasrin Battle vs Susan Hagstrom / Bette Kerhoulas2-6, 4-6
2025-09-13vs SoCal/Reznik/65&Over8.0WLost 02
L#2 DoublesTheresa Kennedy / Barbara Grom vs Katie Guerrero / Julie Vislay7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Hirtler / Jean Maroney vs Andrea Weinstein / Allison Lloyd2-6, 2-6
2025-08-23vs SoCal/Reznik/65&Over8.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesBarbara Grom / Elaine van Rensburg vs Randi Reznik / Andrea Weinstein3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women 8.0 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Sheryl Leicher
published
3.47
Cheryl Hirtler
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.41
Barbara Grom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Char Geary
published 4
Elaine van Rensburg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jean Maroney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nasrin Battle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Theresa Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Grom + Cheryl Hirtler1531% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheryl Leicher
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
3.65
4
Cheryl Hirtler
27W–78L career · 9 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
4
Barbara Grom
50W–144L career · 6 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.41
4
Char Geary
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
Elaine van Rensburg
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jean Maroney
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nasrin Battle
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Theresa Kennedy
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.