Teams

GTC TEAL

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-29vs WP BLACKWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnne Beletic / Shelly Wesner vs Phyllis Suarez / Theresa Wheeler7-6, 6-2
2023-05-22vs GTC YELLOWSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJoyce Kennedy Raymes / Shelly Wesner vs Katie Schneck / Danielle Dahl1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAnne Beletic vs Jennifer Stack6-0, 6-1
2023-05-15Won 20
W#2 DoublesPeggy Moody / Anne Beletic vs Lindsey Begland / Laura Koupal6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJane Harmon / Joyce Kennedy Raymes vs Monica Denler / Trisha Cohen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-08Split 11
L#1 SinglesAnne Beletic vs Paige Lindquist1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoyce Kennedy Raymes / Shelly Wesner vs Chelsea Taylor / Emily Sherman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-01vs APR-U BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnne Beletic / Peggy Moody vs Cherlyn Linden / Laura Steeby6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJoan Murphy / Anne Beletic vs Anne Doubet / Kendall Carbone4-6, 3-6
2023-04-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoyce Kennedy Raymes / Shelly Wesner vs AUSRA MOLLERUD / Stephany Jewell6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Daria Opekunova
published 3
2.88
Anne Beletic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.64
Justine McKinzie
published
2.63
Jane Harmon
published
2.60
Maureen Clarke
published
2.55
Joyce Kennedy Raymes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.46
Peggy Moody
published
Melissa Benavidez
published
Shelly Wesner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Beletic + Peggy Moody2341% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Clarke + Shelly Wesner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daria Opekunova
33W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Anne Beletic
69W–78L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.88
Justine McKinzie
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
Jane Harmon
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
Maureen Clarke
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
2.60
3
Joyce Kennedy Raymes
32W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Peggy Moody
9W–17L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46
Melissa Benavidez
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelly Wesner
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.