Teams

BLACKHAWK CC 40AW2.5+A-DT

2025 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 2.5+

19 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 2.5+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Samantha Ng
published
3.07
Kirsten Sines
published
2.89
Noelle Sheehan
published
2.89
Tina Ly
published
2.86
Shannon Fanning
published
2.83
Dana Keating
published 3
2.83
Joanna Ha
published
2.73
Robin Kenny
published
2.67
Luz Ernest
published
2.67
Emily Sah
published
2.66
Joan Leone
published
2.52
Natasha Deguzman
published
2.50
Claire Taniguchi
published 2.5
2.49
Kimberly Gonzalez
published
2.39
Debbie McGowan
published 2.5
2.36
Teresa Brannon
published
2.31
Winnie Lau
published
2.28
Jean Ann Patridge
published
2.24
Michele Kourey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Taniguchi + Kimberly Gonzalez9265% games+9.4% vs expected
Jean Ann Patridge + Debbie McGowan4157% gamesnot enough data
Luz Ernest + Joan Leone224 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Ng + Joanna Ha134 matchesnot enough data
Kirsten Sines + Natasha Deguzman314 matchesnot enough data
Debbie McGowan + Winnie Lau404 matchesnot enough data
Tina Ly + Shannon Fanning123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Ng
30W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Kirsten Sines
19W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.07
Noelle Sheehan
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Tina Ly
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Shannon Fanning
5W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Dana Keating
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Joanna Ha
23W–26L career · no lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.83
Robin Kenny
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
Luz Ernest
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.67
Emily Sah
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.67
Joan Leone
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%13%87%
2.66
Natasha Deguzman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%45%55%
2.52
2.5
Claire Taniguchi
21W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
Kimberly Gonzalez
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%52%48%
2.49
2.5
Debbie McGowan
20W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%78%22%
2.39
Teresa Brannon
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.36
Winnie Lau
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
Jean Ann Patridge
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Michele Kourey
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.