Teams

Hard Hitters

2023 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.92 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-20vs SenioritasLost 01
L#3 DoublesKayce McEwan / Kelly Haskell vs Jennifer McEntee / Angela Larsen4-6, 0-6
2023-07-11vs HoffmannLost 01
L#2 DoublesKayce McEwan / Kelly Haskell vs Ladawan Johnson / Janet Wilson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-06-23vs Double TroubleWon 10
W#1 DoublesKayce McEwan / Mary Parsons vs Mary Burke / Julie Eisele6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-13vs HoffmannWon 10
W#2 DoublesKayce McEwan / Kelly Haskell vs Patty O'Neill / Joie Carlisle3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesKayce McEwan / Kelly Haskell vs Julie Eisele / Dawn Crochet6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hard Hitters84241232295
2Tenniswise75201637301
3Hoffmann57171945321
4Acing Gracefully39132351359

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Kayce McEwan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.86
Beth Calvo
published 4
3.82
Lori Layne
published 4
3.81
Lisa Diehr
published 4
3.74
Mary Parsons
published 4
3.69
3.62
Becky Caven
published 4
3.60
Jennifer Colson
published 4
3.53
Karen Mangum
published 4
3.43
Terry Hardy
published 4
3.28
Holly Johnson
published 4
3.25
Denise Shawver
published 3.5
3.23
Katherine Johnson
published 3.5
Kelly Haskell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Hardy + Mary Parsons4549% games+6.7% vs expected
Lisa Diehr + Mary Parsons11267% games+6.4% vs expected
Denise Shawver + Elizabeth Blackwell5257% games+4.3% vs expected
Lisa Diehr + Becky Caven6852% games+1.9% vs expected
Jennifer Colson + Becky Caven12852% games+1.1% vs expected
Terry Hardy + Jennifer Colson142948% games+0.1% vs expected
Terry Hardy + Kayce McEwan91248% games−0.2% vs expected
Denise Shawver + Beth Calvo513554% games−0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kayce McEwan
147W–64L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Beth Calvo
172W–128L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Lori Layne
33W–31L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Lisa Diehr
92W–87L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Mary Parsons
169W–125L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Elizabeth Blackwell
43W–21L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Becky Caven
228W–146L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.62
4
Jennifer Colson
94W–98L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Karen Mangum
72W–60L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Terry Hardy
212W–302L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
4
Holly Johnson
65W–65L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.28
3.5
Denise Shawver
70W–72L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Katherine Johnson
128W–141L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Kelly Haskell
78W–129L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.