Teams

Hoffmann

2023 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.68 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-07-18vs Double TroubleWon 20
W#2 DoublesBeth Lassen / Laura Stento vs Debbie Davies / Vicki Osweiler4-1
W#3 DoublesLadawan Johnson / Suzanne Malmstrom vs Angel Marie Bowie / Dawn Crochet6-4, 6-2
2023-07-13vs Penn PalsLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatty O'Neill / Laura Stento vs Suzanne Baran / Wendy Anderson3-6, 3-6
2023-07-11vs Hard HittersWon 10
W#2 DoublesLadawan Johnson / Janet Wilson vs Kayce McEwan / Kelly Haskell6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-27vs TenniswiseWon 20
W#2 DoublesBeth Lassen / Laura Stento vs Nancy Baskin / Lisa Hilde4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLadawan Johnson / Janet Wilson vs Dawna Buckingham / Trang Pham3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-15vs Penn PalsLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Lassen / Laura Stento vs Suzanne Baran / Wendy Anderson3-6, 4-6
2023-06-13vs Hard HittersLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Stento / Margot Gilna vs Beth Calvo / Denise Shawver3-6, 4-6
2023-06-06vs SenioritasLost 01
L#1 DoublesLadawan Johnson / Janet Wilson vs Maria Turner / Jenny Grunke5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-06-01vs TenniswiseLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Wilson / Ladawan Johnson vs Valerie Roberts / Maryann Moorhead6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-30vs Acing GracefullyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Stento / Margot Gilna vs Jane Perlaky / Jenny Tobin6-4, 6-2
2023-05-23vs Double TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoie Carlisle / Laura Stento vs Mary Chodroff / Mary Burke0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hard Hitters84241232295
2Tenniswise75201637301
3Hoffmann57171945321
4Acing Gracefully39132351359

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Margot Gilna
published 4
3.57
Lisa Kasney
published 4
3.50
Patty O'Neill
published 4
3.47
Beth Lassen
published 4
3.46
Margie Waddel
published 3.5
3.38
Amy Hoffmann
published 3.5
3.34
Mary Stone-Arave
published 3.5
3.28
Suzanne Malmstrom
published 3.5
3.27
Janet Wilson
published 3.5
3.20
Patty Jackson
published 3.5
3.17
Joie Carlisle
published 3.5
Ladawan Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Laura Stento
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Lisa Snelling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joie Carlisle + Beth Lassen11551% games+3.7% vs expected
Lisa Kasney + Margot Gilna6353% games−0.0% vs expected
Joie Carlisle + Patty O'Neill3545% games−2.6% vs expected
Suzanne Malmstrom + Margie Waddel223948% games−4.2% vs expected
Lisa Kasney + Patty O'Neill31046% games−13.6% vs expected
Mary Stone-Arave + Ladawan Johnson121254% gamesnot enough data
Laura Stento + Beth Lassen8448% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Kasney + Ladawan Johnson4445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Margot Gilna
85W–67L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Lisa Kasney
58W–63L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Patty O'Neill
106W–106L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Beth Lassen
82W–57L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Margie Waddel
110W–127L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Amy Hoffmann
20W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Mary Stone-Arave
26W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Suzanne Malmstrom
108W–112L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Janet Wilson
151W–129L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Patty Jackson
93W–84L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Joie Carlisle
53W–47L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Ladawan Johnson
44W–69L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Stento
36W–35L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Snelling
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.