Teams

CLAREMONT R and S 18AW3.0A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kye Heinstein
published
3.36
Dina Wolkoff
published 3.5
3.30
Susan Zhao
published
3.25
Christina Wiellette
published 3.5
Alexis Ramenofsky
published 3.5
3.08
Janicke Polumbo
published
3.05
Susan Kung
published
2.92
Cortney Allen
published 3
2.83
Jackie Vincent
published 3
2.79
Maryam Amini
published
2.72
Annette Clear
published 3
2.69
Susie Poncelet
published
2.59
2.56
Katrine Shelton
published
Laura Graham
published
Nathalie Destandau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janicke Polumbo + Susan Zhao314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Kung + Christina Wiellette134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kye Heinstein
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Dina Wolkoff
26W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Susan Zhao
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Christina Wiellette
1W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alexis Ramenofsky
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Janicke Polumbo
15W–15L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
Susan Kung
6W–18L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Cortney Allen
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Jackie Vincent
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Maryam Amini
8W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Annette Clear
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
Susie Poncelet
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Inocencia Jayaratne
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
2.59
Katrine Shelton
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
Laura Graham
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nathalie Destandau
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.