Teams

Sunpro-Westover/Hall

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-08vs Liberty Park Tennis-HarmonWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelanie Hall / Carolyn Barber vs Rebecca Harman / Jennifer Tooley6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTiffany Ashman / Kaylene Andrew vs Bonnie Whitesides / Lori Wilson1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Lewis / Diane Heaps vs JaNean Nelson / Maria Pettit6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-08-01Won 20
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Barber / Lori Curtis vs Carolee Romney / Claudine Finlay6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJenni Warner / Sherston Faux vs Inga Nelson / Michelle Edwards4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSuzette Greer vs Mithona Nielsen1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Edwards / Carolyn Barber vs Terri Brunner / Lisa Ewing7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJenni Warner / Tiffany Ashman vs Kathryne Higgins / Kelley Allred6-3, 6-3
2023-07-18vs Ivory Ridge-AdamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Burdge / Lori Curtis vs Cecia Croft / Heidi Beckstead6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiane Heaps / Laurie Lewis vs Jamie Harris / Monique Tidd6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSherston Faux / Suzette Greer vs Heather Cottrell / Jacqueline Williams1-6, 5-7
2023-07-11vs Liberty Park Tennis-Assemi/HandlonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Barber / Melanie Hall vs Maryam Klock / Laurie Summers6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSherston Faux / Suzette Greer vs Jennifer Sweat / Summer Borla1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDiane Heaps / Laurie Lewis vs Malisa Bowen / Kelly Webster3-6, 0-6
2023-06-20vs Park City MARC-Leigh/EpsteinLost 12
L#1 SinglesJenni Warner vs Charlotte Trahan4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Barber / Julie Edwards vs Jutien Page / AMy Huish4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRaquel Westover / Lori Curtis vs Deborah Leigh / Karen Yocum7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-13Split 11
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Barber / Lori Curtis vs Molly Adams / KayeLynn BASTIAN5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTiffany Ashman / Jenni Warner vs Jennifer Tooley / JaNean Nelson1-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Melanie Hall
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
3.57
Suzanne Burdge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Carolyn Barber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Raquel Westover
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.21
Diane Heaps
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Kaylene Andrew
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.17
Tiffany Ashman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Jenni Warner
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Lori Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Sherston Faux
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Laurie Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Suzette Greer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Julie Edwards
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Hall + Carolyn Barber8360% games+7.4% vs expected
Julie Edwards + Melanie Hall4454% games+4.4% vs expected
Suzanne Burdge + Melanie Hall151055% games+3.0% vs expected
Tiffany Ashman + Jenni Warner6550% games+3.0% vs expected
Suzanne Burdge + Lori Curtis251554% games+1.9% vs expected
Laurie Lewis + Kaylene Andrew4749% games+1.9% vs expected
Jenni Warner + Diane Heaps10657% games+1.8% vs expected
Jenni Warner + Sherston Faux4348% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Hall
59W–49L career · 7 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
Suzanne Burdge
89W–81L career · 4 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Carolyn Barber
88W–75L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Raquel Westover
113W–129L career · 9 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Diane Heaps
92W–121L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
Kaylene Andrew
48W–71L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Tiffany Ashman
97W–89L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Jenni Warner
61W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
Lori Curtis
85W–110L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Sherston Faux
88W–157L career · 8 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99
Laurie Lewis
40W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.93
3
Suzette Greer
75W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
Julie Edwards
23W–35L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.