Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Leishman/Ewing

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W AM

19 players · average NTRP 3.55 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-25vs Sunpro-Westover/HallWon 10
W#1 SinglesMithona Nielsen vs Suzette Greer6-1, 6-0
2023-07-18Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMithona Nielsen vs Jennifer Sampson2-6, 3-6
2023-07-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesKathi Poggi / Mithona Nielsen vs Maria Pettit / Lili Leiataua Iosefa6-4, 7-6
2023-06-27vs Ivory Ridge-AdamsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Yuen / Terri Brunner vs Heather Cottrell / Carol Oltjen5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesTerri Brunner / Kelly Yuen vs Namrata Handlon / Allison Kendell7-5, 6-3
2023-06-13Won 10
W#1 SinglesMithona Nielsen vs Angela Bleak6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Mithona Nielsen
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.27
Lisa Ewing
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Anna Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Heather Sliwa
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Jennie Stacey
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Ann Trentman
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.18
Terri Brunner
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.14
Kathi Poggi
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Shelly Kemp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.07
Allison Leishman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.94
Katie Winson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
2.92
Kadee Wolfgram
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Nancy Sparrer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.85
Kelley Allred
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kathryne Higgins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kelly Yuen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
LaNece Andreason
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lezlae Grubb
published
Tracee Kemp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Trentman + Lisa Ewing5257% games+8.5% vs expected
Shelly Kemp + Heather Sliwa7063% games+7.9% vs expected
Tracee Kemp + Kelley Allred5259% games+6.5% vs expected
Katie Winson + Kelley Allred12556% games+5.5% vs expected
Jennie Stacey + Allison Leishman4551% games+5.2% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Heather Sliwa6751% games+4.4% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Terri Brunner9852% games+4.0% vs expected
Terri Brunner + Heather Sliwa231253% games+3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mithona Nielsen
112W–116L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.70
Lisa Ewing
123W–122L career · 13 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Anna Palmer
10W–19L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Heather Sliwa
82W–61L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Jennie Stacey
153W–129L career · 8 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Ann Trentman
185W–245L career · 13 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Terri Brunner
141W–141L career · 7 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Kathi Poggi
56W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Shelly Kemp
137W–133L career · 9 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Allison Leishman
132W–209L career · 10 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Katie Winson
128W–122L career · 7 lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.94
3.5
Kadee Wolfgram
97W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
3.5
Nancy Sparrer
28W–100L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.87
Kelley Allred
71W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
Kathryne Higgins
21W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Yuen
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
LaNece Andreason
41W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lezlae Grubb
32W–41L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracee Kemp
38W–101L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.