Teams

MORRIS/FS/HCC

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-03vs Gilliam/FS/HOWon 20
W#1 DoublesSara Cunningham / Lora Smith vs Billie Nelligan / Lauren Lucky3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoanna Ayala / Emily Barr vs Mel Schaefer / Courtney Craft6-1, 6-4
2026-07-28vs Gilliam/FS/HOWon 21
W#1 DoublesAudrey Ostrander / Christine Turpin vs Kara Cunningham / Lauren Lucky6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJoanna Ayala / Sara Adair vs Roxanne Parker / Victoria Cormier6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLacey Kennon / Matheson Ladd vs Glenna Gilliam / Cristy Harp3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-12vs Gilliam/FS/HOLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristine Turpin / Audrey Ostrander vs Kara Cunningham / Billie Nelligan6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSara Adair / Carrie Curtis vs Mischelle Roam / Courtney Craft7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLexi Morris / Matheson Ladd vs Cristy Harp / Morgan Kremers1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-02vs Gilliam/FS/HOWon 30
W#1 DoublesLora Smith / Sara Cunningham vs Kara Cunningham / Naomi Conley6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEmily Barr / Christy Williams vs Mel Schaefer / Mischelle Roam6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLexi Morris / Matheson Ladd vs Shannon Shell / Cristy Harp6-3, 7-5
2026-06-17vs Gilliam/FS/HOWon 21
W#1 DoublesLora Smith / Sara Cunningham vs Billie Nelligan / Naomi Conley6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJessica Irgens / Christy Williams vs Victoria Cormier / Roxanne Parker4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLexi Morris / Lacey Kennon vs Glenna Gilliam / Shannon Shell0-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MORRIS/FS/HCC411141093

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Sara Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Audrey Ostrander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Christine Turpin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Emily Barr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Sara Adair
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Joanna Ayala
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Lora Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Carrie Curtis
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.95
Jessica Irgens
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.86
Jessica Ubbenga
published
2.73
Matheson Ladd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Lacey Kennon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Lexi Morris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Ostrander + Lora Smith5068% games+15.6% vs expected
Lora Smith + Sara Cunningham5068% games+10.1% vs expected
Sara Adair + Joanna Ayala13164% games+9.0% vs expected
Audrey Ostrander + Sara Cunningham404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Cunningham
26W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Audrey Ostrander
24W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Christine Turpin
9W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Emily Barr
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Sara Adair
22W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Joanna Ayala
26W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Lora Smith
17W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.15
3.5
Carrie Curtis
13W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Jessica Irgens
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.95
Jessica Ubbenga
14W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Matheson Ladd
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Lacey Kennon
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Lexi Morris
16W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.