Teams

Gilliam/FS/HO

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-03vs MORRIS/FS/HCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesBillie Nelligan / Lauren Lucky vs Sara Cunningham / Lora Smith6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMel Schaefer / Courtney Craft vs Joanna Ayala / Emily Barr1-6, 4-6
2026-07-28vs MORRIS/FS/HCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKara Cunningham / Lauren Lucky vs Audrey Ostrander / Christine Turpin0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRoxanne Parker / Victoria Cormier vs Joanna Ayala / Sara Adair1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Cristy Harp vs Lacey Kennon / Matheson Ladd6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-12vs MORRIS/FS/HCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesKara Cunningham / Billie Nelligan vs Christine Turpin / Audrey Ostrander1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMischelle Roam / Courtney Craft vs Sara Adair / Carrie Curtis5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCristy Harp / Morgan Kremers vs Lexi Morris / Matheson Ladd1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-02vs MORRIS/FS/HCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKara Cunningham / Naomi Conley vs Lora Smith / Sara Cunningham2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMel Schaefer / Mischelle Roam vs Emily Barr / Christy Williams3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Shell / Cristy Harp vs Lexi Morris / Matheson Ladd3-6, 5-7
2026-06-17vs MORRIS/FS/HCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBillie Nelligan / Naomi Conley vs Lora Smith / Sara Cunningham2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesVictoria Cormier / Roxanne Parker vs Jessica Irgens / Christy Williams6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Shannon Shell vs Lexi Morris / Lacey Kennon6-0, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gilliam/FS/HO53121227225

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Lauren Lucky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Kara Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Naomi Conley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Billie Nelligan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.19
Mischelle Roam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Courtney Craft
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Roxanne Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Victoria Cormier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Mel Schaefer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.84
Glenna Gilliam
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.83
Morgan Kremers
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.48
Cristy Harp
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.35
Shannon Shell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roxanne Parker + Victoria Cormier82640% games−3.2% vs expected
Billie Nelligan + Naomi Conley1627% games−11.5% vs expected
Shannon Shell + Victoria Cormier2347% gamesnot enough data
Courtney Craft + Mischelle Roam314 matchesnot enough data
Cristy Harp + Morgan Kremers404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Lucky
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.64
Kara Cunningham
14W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
Naomi Conley
7W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.36
4
Billie Nelligan
5W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.24
Mischelle Roam
19W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Courtney Craft
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
Roxanne Parker
14W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Victoria Cormier
14W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.96
Mel Schaefer
13W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.85
3
Glenna Gilliam
49W–32L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Morgan Kremers
42W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Cristy Harp
23W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Shannon Shell
8W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.