Teams

SKY BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.07 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-31vs EM REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSilke Larson / Jocelyn Murphy vs Kathy Klein / Kristen Schiffner7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSharon Alton vs Lisa Allen7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKerry Hutcheson vs Ellen Leher6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCynthia Frandsen / Paula Daukas vs Jen Fornstrom / Lindsey MClintock2-6, 4-6
2025-05-19vs GCC BLUEWon 41
W#1 DoublesCatherine Hodges / Emily Brown vs Rebecca Givens / Nicole Conroy6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKelly Gloeckler vs Alexandra Kister6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKerry Hutcheson / Paula Daukas vs Katherine Crisham / Lizzie Vann5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSharon Alton vs Katie Donohue6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAngie Sanders / Cynthia Frandsen vs Christine Viney / Sarah Schnittman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-12vs SS-D PURPLEWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Gloeckler / Emily Brown vs Linda Head / Linda Paysinger6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKerry Hutcheson / Susan Cleveland vs Pamela Kennel / Suzy Farrell6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSilke Larson vs Lindsay Pratt6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Hodges / Jessie Johnson vs Gail Heitland / Katherine Phillips6-4, 6-2
2025-05-05vs HW BLUEWon 40
W#1 SinglesKelly Gloeckler vs Brooke Rebstock4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Cleveland / Angie Sanders vs Margaret Lee / Molly Groves6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCatherine Hodges vs Fawna Kritzer6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSilke Larson / Sharon Alton vs McKay Pittman / Tisha Smith6-2, 6-2
2025-04-28vs HRCA-N GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesSilke Larson / Jocelyn Murphy vs Brooke Cheishvili / Tracy Klein6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulie Wright / Catherine Hodges vs Renee Thouvenot / Cassie Perez6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSharon Alton vs Daniella Rowley6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPaula Daukas / Cynthia Frandsen vs Tina Ruggiero / Jana Donohoe2-6, 1-6
2025-04-21vs SS-H GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesEmily Brown / Kelly Gloeckler vs Aaren Wiesler / Stacy Beharry6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSilke Larson / Jocelyn Murphy vs Leslie Clay / Rebecca Bontrager6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCatherine Hodges vs Elizabeth Bonder6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCynthia Frandsen / Susan Cleveland vs Stacie Moncrief / Kelli Douglass7-5, 7-6
2025-04-14vs HV SILVERWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Gloeckler / Angie Sanders vs Elena Ellcessor / Jean Mortellaro6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSilke Larson / Jocelyn Murphy vs Linda Sjoberg / Anna Larsen6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesKerry Hutcheson vs Danielle Kennedy6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Daukas / Susan Cleveland vs Charlotte Brady / Carol Bryant3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Kelly Gloeckler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Kerry Hutcheson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.22
Catherine Hodges
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.82
Sharon Alton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Jocelyn Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Silke Larson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Jessie Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Susan Cleveland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Paula Daukas
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.33
Cynthia Frandsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jocelyn Murphy + Cynthia Frandsen3353% games+2.2% vs expected
Jocelyn Murphy + Silke Larson412056% games+2.2% vs expected
Paula Daukas + Cynthia Frandsen81044% games−8.3% vs expected
Silke Larson + Paula Daukas303 matchesnot enough data
Silke Larson + Cynthia Frandsen123 matchesnot enough data
Paula Daukas + Catherine Hodges123 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Hutcheson + Sharon Alton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kelly Gloeckler
65W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3
Kerry Hutcheson
58W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.25
3.5
Catherine Hodges
66W–31L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
3
Sharon Alton
55W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
Jocelyn Murphy
75W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Silke Larson
126W–95L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Jessie Johnson
22W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
Susan Cleveland
48W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Paula Daukas
41W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
2.5
Cynthia Frandsen
40W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.