Teams

SS-D PURPLE

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-26vs SS-H GREENLost 23
L#1 DoublesPamela Kennel / Katherine Phillips vs Leslie Clay / Alison Goltermann6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLindsay Pratt vs Stacy Beharry6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Head / Linda Paysinger vs Elizabeth Bonder / Alexandra Beltz6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSuzy Farrell vs Rebecca Bontrager5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDeAnne Smith / Jean Dixon vs Stacie Moncrief / Hannah Quintana6-2, 6-1
2025-05-19vs EM REDLost 23
W#1 DoublesJean Dixon / Pamela Kennel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLindsay Pratt vs Kristen Schiffner6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLinda Head / Linda Paysinger vs Lisa Allen / Dana Keefe2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDeAnne Smith vs Lindsey MClintock2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSuzy Farrell / Gail Heitland vs Jen Fornstrom / Kathy Klein2-6, 3-6
2025-05-13vs HRCA-N GREENWon 41
W#1 DoublesSuzy Farrell / Jean Dixon vs Cassie Perez / Daniella Rowley6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSarah Ward vs Kristin Hull7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGail Heitland / Linda Paysinger vs Brooke Cheishvili / Tina Ruggiero4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLindsay Pratt vs Jana Donohoe6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKatherine Phillips / Pamela Kennel vs Lisa Garbin / Tracy Klein6-3, 7-6
2025-05-12vs SKY BLUELost 14
L#1 DoublesLinda Head / Linda Paysinger vs Kelly Gloeckler / Emily Brown3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Ward vs Angie Sanders2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Kennel / Suzy Farrell vs Kerry Hutcheson / Susan Cleveland2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLindsay Pratt vs Silke Larson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGail Heitland / Katherine Phillips vs Catherine Hodges / Jessie Johnson4-6, 2-6
2025-04-28vs HV SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatherine Phillips / Pamela Kennel vs Margo Ellis / Leslie Moody3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSuzy Farrell / Gail Heitland vs Elena Ellcessor / Jean Mortellaro6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Head / Linda Paysinger vs Carol Bryant / Linda Sjoberg6-3, 6-2
2025-04-21vs GCC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesLinda Head / DeAnne Smith vs Monique Fox / Rebecca Givens6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLindsay Pratt vs Katie Donohue6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJean Dixon / Suzy Farrell vs Katherine Crisham / Lizzie Vann2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPamela Kennel / Katherine Phillips vs Tamara Brown / Christine Ford6-2, 6-0
2025-04-14vs HW BLUEWon 32
L#1 DoublesJean Dixon / Suzy Farrell vs McKay Pittman / Jessica Wise4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Ward vs Jill Schladetzky6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Head / Linda Paysinger vs Bridgette Ward / Heather Prier1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLindsay Pratt vs Tisha Smith6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPamela Kennel / DeAnne Smith vs Molly Groves / Fawna Kritzer6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Sarah Ward
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.91
Jean Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Pamela Kennel
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.75
DeAnne Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.72
Suzy Farrell
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.65
Gail Heitland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.56
Linda Head
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Katherine Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Lindsay Pratt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Dixon + Suzy Farrell303648% games+1.6% vs expected
Pamela Kennel + Linda Head2741% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Phillips + Pamela Kennel3355% gamesnot enough data
Gail Heitland + Linda Head1549% gamesnot enough data
Gail Heitland + Suzy Farrell0530% gamesnot enough data
DeAnne Smith + Pamela Kennel314 matchesnot enough data
Gail Heitland + Pamela Kennel134 matchesnot enough data
Suzy Farrell + Pamela Kennel134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sarah Ward
77W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Jean Dixon
39W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Pamela Kennel
29W–61L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
DeAnne Smith
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Suzy Farrell
33W–60L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Gail Heitland
18W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Linda Head
33W–56L career · 6 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Katherine Phillips
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsay Pratt
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.