Teams

KTC Chamberlain

2025 OH OV FALL 40&O Mixed · FALL 40&O 7.0MXD

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-20vs KTC GramzaLost 03
L#1 DoublesJayme Soulati / Ramzi Nahhas vs Tristan Handler / Shanelle Witting3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelonie Johnson / Thomas Tisler vs Andrew Kiger / Casey Gill5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKatrina Callahan / Mike Madoffori vs Richard Pickrel / Georgianne Lowman3-6, 5-7
2024-11-24vs STC SayerWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelonie Johnson / Thomas Tisler vs Karima Buchholz / Tim Sayer6-2, 6-0
2024-11-15vs QRRC WebbWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelonie Johnson / Thomas Tisler vs Valerie Webb / Ryan Maurer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatrina Callahan / Miguel Layrisse vs AYESHA CURE / Nicholas Dalton6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-01vs WPAFB CoyLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeryl Hattenbach / Miguel Layrisse vs Tony Brown / Skylla Frye5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Whitcomb / Dennis Pulaski vs Joseph Graham / Jan Wineberg6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJayme Soulati / Ramzi Nahhas vs Douglas Coy / Wendy Kunkle3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-10-18Won 20
W#2 DoublesMike Madoffori / Karen Coffman vs Nichole Ingram / Thomas Chillinsky6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMiguel Layrisse / Deborah Whitcomb vs Mary Miller / Michael Lee6-2, 6-2
2024-10-04vs QRRC BurkleLost 02
L#2 DoublesDennis Pulaski / Karen Coffman vs SCOTT WELDE / TOMOKO WELDE1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJayme Soulati / James Dunlap vs Jessie Loeffelholz / Jacob Loeffelholz2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · FALL 40&O 7.0MXD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KTC Chamberlain4210820166
2SRTC Mullins339920171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Melonie Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Meryl Hattenbach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Jayme Soulati
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Rajeev Goel
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.30
Katrina Callahan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Dennis Pulaski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Mike Madoffori
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Thomas Tisler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Deborah Whitcomb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Miguel Layrisse
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Karen Coffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
James Dunlap
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Sara Walk
published
2.74
Johnna Chamberlain
published
2.53
Ramzi Nahhas
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Kevin Lopez
published
Shilpa Goel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Coffman + Rajeev Goel10653% games+10.3% vs expected
Deborah Whitcomb + Rajeev Goel8651% games+7.4% vs expected
Johnna Chamberlain + Rajeev Goel10852% games+5.9% vs expected
Rajeev Goel + Shilpa Goel4445% games+3.2% vs expected
Thomas Tisler + Jayme Soulati2345% games+0.9% vs expected
Melonie Johnson + Thomas Tisler81051% games+0.2% vs expected
Meryl Hattenbach + Rajeev Goel7453% games−0.0% vs expected
Miguel Layrisse + Katrina Callahan4258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melonie Johnson
174W–134L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Meryl Hattenbach
146W–111L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Jayme Soulati
77W–161L career · 3 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.41
Rajeev Goel
142W–117L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Katrina Callahan
83W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Dennis Pulaski
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Madoffori
76W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Thomas Tisler
71W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
3.5
Deborah Whitcomb
143W–159L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Miguel Layrisse
68W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Karen Coffman
59W–129L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
James Dunlap
40W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Sara Walk
57W–68L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
Johnna Chamberlain
56W–96L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Ramzi Nahhas
31W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Kevin Lopez
22W–36L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shilpa Goel
42W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.