Teams

SRTC Mullins

2025 OH OV FALL 40&O Mixed · FALL 40&O 7.0MXD

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-24vs KTC GramzaWon 10
W#2 DoublesTodd Kissel / Sally Schmidt vs Patrick Gill / Jill Bramini6-2, 6-0
2024-11-01Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSally Schmidt / Thomas Chillinsky vs TOMOKO WELDE / SCOTT WELDE6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · FALL 40&O 7.0MXD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KTC Chamberlain4210820166
2SRTC Mullins339920171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Sally Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Carol Poe
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.46
Lindsay Bremar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Thomas Chillinsky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
James Bremar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Janet Culley
published
3.05
Todd Kissel
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Cecil Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Kathe Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Nichole Ingram
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Stephen Ward
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cecil Mullins + Carol Poe6455% games+1.5% vs expected
Kathe Mullins + Cecil Mullins7850% games−0.4% vs expected
Todd Kissel + Carol Poe5257% games−0.5% vs expected
James Bremar + Lindsay Bremar121747% games−3.7% vs expected
Cecil Mullins + Sally Schmidt4248% games−4.8% vs expected
Thomas Chillinsky + Carol Poe3646% games−12.5% vs expected
Thomas Chillinsky + Sally Schmidt0541% gamesnot enough data
Todd Kissel + Sally Schmidt404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sally Schmidt
132W–86L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Carol Poe
198W–158L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Lindsay Bremar
129W–134L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Thomas Chillinsky
33W–65L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
James Bremar
59W–88L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Janet Culley
46W–53L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Todd Kissel
62W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Cecil Mullins
69W–86L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Kathe Mullins
194W–75L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nichole Ingram
54W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Ward
42W–58L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.