Teams

V - PRC Low Tides

2022 SoCal Tri-Level 18 &Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-18vs V - North RanchLost 01
L#1 DoublesYang Ja Ballard / Nathalie Smith vs Kathy Ferrari / Karen Saitta1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-09-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesYang Ja Ballard / Rebekah Wellik vs Debra Blackwell-Schrag / Susan White Wood6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesYang Ja Ballard / Julie Porrazzo vs Debra Blackwell-Schrag / Ann Gallimore1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Finney / Keressa Garland vs Linda Hewitt / Crystal Kallik2-6, 4-6
2022-08-28vs V - Sunset Thunder SistersLost 01
L#1 DoublesAkemi Martin / Yang Ja Ballard vs Victoria Silver / Mia de Leon1-6, 4-6
2022-08-20vs V - Arroyo Vista - Worth a TriLost 01
L#1 DoublesAkemi Martin / Julie Porrazzo vs Lan Chao / Ana Gorman7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2022-08-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesDarcy Antonellis / Keressa Garland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-06vs V - Sunset Thunder SistersLost 02
L#1 DoublesAkemi Martin / Rebekah Wellik vs Elain Cleary / Susan Dahlberg3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSiri Rochin / Keressa Garland vs Sherry Meinhart / Deborah Cassar2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Yang Ja Ballard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Darcy Antonellis
published 4
3.69
Nathalie Smith
published
3.68
Julie Porrazzo
published
3.62
Akemi Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Rebekah Wellik
published
Arlene Monnar
published 3.5
3.19
Myla Hanson
published
3.08
Keressa Garland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kristin Jolley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yang Ja Ballard + Akemi Martin314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yang Ja Ballard
137W–73L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Darcy Antonellis
17W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Nathalie Smith
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Julie Porrazzo
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Akemi Martin
73W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
Rebekah Wellik
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Arlene Monnar
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Myla Hanson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Keressa Garland
88W–113L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.08
Kristin Jolley
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.