Teams

V - North Ranch

2022 SoCal Tri-Level 18 &Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-18vs V - PRC Low TidesWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Ferrari / Karen Saitta vs Yang Ja Ballard / Nathalie Smith6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-08-31vs V - Sunset Thunder SistersLost 01
L#1 DoublesLiat Ciardi / Lauren Plutsky vs Elain Cleary / Susan Dahlberg2-6, 2-6
2022-08-28vs V - Arroyo Vista - Worth a TriLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Byer / Karen Saitta vs Ana Gorman / Suzie Yamamoto6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesLori Byer / Kathy Ferrari vs Susan White Wood / Nahed Stefany2-6, 1-6
2022-07-24vs V - Arroyo Vista - Worth a TriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLori Byer / Kathy Ferrari vs Suzie Yamamoto / Lisa Moran7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLiat Ciardi / Amy Whitney vs Kasia Domenech / Deanne Saucerman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Jennifer Wishengrad
published
3.58
Lori Byer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Bodee Lee
published 3.5
3.44
Natascha Crecion
published
3.41
Brooke Roth
published 3.5
3.38
Angela Reynolds
published 3.5
3.33
Liat Ciardi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Amy Whitney
published 3.5
3.07
Lauren Plutsky
published
3.04
Beth Benton
published 3.5
2.80
Joeli Gutfleisch
published
Kathy Ferrari
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
LAURA BROWN
published
Wendy Dormer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Ferrari + Lori Byer121251% games−7.9% vs expected
Lori Byer + Liat Ciardi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Wishengrad
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Lori Byer
90W–93L career · 5 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Bodee Lee
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Natascha Crecion
13W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Brooke Roth
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Angela Reynolds
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Liat Ciardi
204W–176L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Amy Whitney
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Lauren Plutsky
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Beth Benton
11W–15L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
Joeli Gutfleisch
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Kathy Ferrari
57W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
LAURA BROWN
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Dormer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.