Teams

JDichak (WSRC)

2024 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Mon PM

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-29vs AHunt (Matthews)Split 22
L#1 DoublesEric O'Brien / Frank Grindle vs Jeff Morgan / David Whiteman2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRon Dock vs Jim Stout3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Twer / Kevin Staley vs Andy Hunt / Bryant Barnhardt6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChad Foster / Todd Creange vs Leo Liu / Larry Pratt6-1, 6-1
2024-04-22vs JCook (Carmel)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAdam Dawson / Frank Grindle vs Philip Yancey / Robert Aliota6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMichael Twer vs John Conklin1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMike Gentile / Chad Foster vs Mark Coons / Andrew Halverstam1-6, 2-6
2024-04-15vs KSwain (Col Beatty)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesRon Dock vs Rakesh Padhy1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Dichak / Mike Gentile vs Varadh Srinivasan / Sudarshan Sridharan5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesChad Foster / Todd Creange vs Krishna Swain / Piyush Sinha1-6, 5-7
2024-04-08vs SSofsian (PCC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Twer / Daniel Kolepp vs Jay Offerdahl / Joshua Benton3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMike Gentile / Frank Grindle vs Gary Leavitt / Scott Sofsian0-6, 3-6
2024-04-01vs WDawson (Olde Providence)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJoseph Dichak / Frank Grindle vs Tai Kam / Jerry Lee7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKevin Staley / Michael Twer vs Brian Jennaro / Rusty Parker0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesVladislav Valtsis / Ron Dock vs Wally Dawson / Eric Jenkins3-6, 4-6
2024-03-11vs DJoo (Life Time)Won 31
W#1 DoublesAdam Dawson / Daniel Kolepp vs Zhen Zu / David Tyson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichael Twer vs Ram Nanduri4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesFrank Grindle / Joseph Dichak vs Kirk Tatge / Juha Lehtinen6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrew Lawler / Todd Creange vs Kenneth Dorado / Todd Paris6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-03-04vs MMerkel (Park Crossing)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAdam Dawson / Daniel Kolepp vs Kevin Boyle / Ian Dabrowski3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlberto Botero / Frank Grindle vs Rick Haskell / Matt Cutrone3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-02-26vs GQuattlebaum (OPRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesEric O'Brien / Joseph Dichak vs Andrew McWilliams / Rigdon Terrell5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRon Dock / Mike Gentile vs Gerald Quattlebaum / Daniel Thailer7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTodd Creange / Chad Foster vs John Nurkin / Rohan Paul7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Daniel Kolepp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Frank Grindle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Adam Dawson
published 3.5
3.37
Joseph Dichak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Chad Foster
published 3.5
3.29
Andrew Lawler
published 3.5
3.27
Eric O'Brien
published
3.25
Kevin Staley
published
3.15
Mike Gentile
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Michael Twer
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Ron Dock
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Vladislav Valtsis
published
3.12
Todd Creange
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.11
Alberto Botero
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Kolepp + Adam Dawson7066% games+12.0% vs expected
Frank Grindle + Joseph Dichak8850% games−4.0% vs expected
Mike Gentile + Ron Dock5647% gamesnot enough data
Michael Twer + Ron Dock4553% gamesnot enough data
Mike Gentile + Joseph Dichak2738% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Dichak + Ron Dock8158% gamesnot enough data
Frank Grindle + Mike Gentile2348% gamesnot enough data
Ron Dock + Todd Creange1443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Kolepp
164W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Frank Grindle
99W–53L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Adam Dawson
16W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Joseph Dichak
138W–146L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Chad Foster
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Andrew Lawler
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Eric O'Brien
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Kevin Staley
7W–17L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Mike Gentile
114W–104L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Michael Twer
50W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Ron Dock
85W–85L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Vladislav Valtsis
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Todd Creange
53W–96L career · 7 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Alberto Botero
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.