Teams

Brookhaven/Musgrove-Hrnicek W3.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-21vs Royal Oaks/Korinek W3.5Split 22
W#1 DoublesJuliann Barkley / Lora Thomas vs Molly Cordell / Holly Reed7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmber Ostrander vs Laurie Korinek6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSheri Stinson / Evelyn Werbaneth vs Courtney Mayberry / Amy Tremper1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Musgrove / Iliana Tamacas vs Monica Knake / Nellie Sciutto0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Amber Ostrander
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Jana Chester
published
3.27
Claudine Record
published 3.5
3.19
Ambur Finley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
3.12
Lora Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Evelyn Werbaneth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Juliann Barkley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Wilkes
published
Michelle Hrnicek
published
Pamela Musgrove
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sheri Stinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Ostrander + Jana Chester213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amber Ostrander
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Jana Chester
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Claudine Record
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Ambur Finley
3W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Laura Kelly Mattingly
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Lora Thomas
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.12
Evelyn Werbaneth
1W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Juliann Barkley
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Wilkes
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Hrnicek
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Musgrove
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sheri Stinson
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.