Teams

SFV LLW - Porter Valley 8.0Mx - Chad Fenwick

2025 Mixed 18+ Winter · SFV 18 & Over - 8.0 MxD

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesDhruv Sareen / Tammy Scher vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-23vs SFV - AV Stormers MxDLost 01
L#3 DoublesEvan Press / Michele Venegas vs Cynthia Garcia / Carlos Guarin7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-03-16vs SFV - Magnificent 8Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMichele Venegas / Dhruv Sareen vs Irene Feher / Dastan Mazhetayev4-6, 5-7
2025-03-01vs SFV - Double Hell-ix!Won 10
W#3 DoublesNeil Patak / Michele Venegas vs Sarah Brownstein / Jeff Bushell6-3, 6-4
2025-02-23vs SFV - MulhollandSplit 11
W#2 DoublesNeil Patak / Michele Venegas vs Schuyler Grant / Aaron Meyerson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChad Fenwick / VICKY TRINH vs Samira Sizdahkhani / Howard Cheng6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - 8.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Dhruv Sareen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Shane Duffy
published
4.03
Evan Press
published 4.5
3.99
Chad Fenwick
published 4
3.92
Neil Patak
published
3.89
Maureen Shideh
published
3.83
Summer Williamson
published
3.81
VICKY TRINH
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Tefft Smith
published
3.25
Aniko Hill
published 3.5
3.22
Will Brennan
published
3.20
Michele Venegas
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Tammy Scher
published
Rob Stanfield
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Venegas + Dhruv Sareen5355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dhruv Sareen
71W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
Shane Duffy
25W–21L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Evan Press
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Chad Fenwick
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Neil Patak
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.92
Maureen Shideh
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
Summer Williamson
49W–27L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
VICKY TRINH
163W–101L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Tefft Smith
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.79
3.5
Aniko Hill
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Will Brennan
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Michele Venegas
97W–95L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Tammy Scher
4W–26L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Rob Stanfield
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.