Teams

Park City MARC-Halsey

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 7.0W

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-07vs Park City MARC-Tomczyk/LeighLost 02
L#1 DoublesTerry Sidford / Sue Ann Kern vs Sarah Berkowitz / Marcy Casp6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDenise Konrad / Lynne Anderson vs Valerie Burman / Lisa Bedell3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-06-30vs Brighton High School-CarruthersLost 02
L#2 DoublesLynne Anderson / Denise Konrad vs Anne Gray / Martina Stewart3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Christian / Sue Ann Kern vs Becky Hall / Shelly Kemp1-6, 2-6
2021-06-16vs South Jordan-Simmons/PaskinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Christian / Denise Konrad vs Kristy Simmons / Elaine Hansen2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTerry Sidford / Lynne Anderson vs Mindi Paskins / Robin Simmons3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMindy Halsey / Kim Persky vs Ellyn Bennett / Diane Poole6-4, 6-2
2021-06-09vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-Cox/WebbWon 20
W#2 DoublesMarie Jackson / Eileen Coccaro vs Jacki Joseph / Melanie Decker6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMindy Halsey / Terry Sidford vs Kaye Moulding / Yaeko Bryner7-5, 6-2
2021-06-02vs Park City MARC-Tomczyk/LeighLost 12
W#1 DoublesTerry Sidford / Kim Persky vs Sara Bartlett / Deborah Leigh6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSue Ann Kern / Nancy Matz vs Dayna Stern / Karen Yocum4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEileen Coccaro / Jane Garrard vs Shana Overton / Kristi Johnson3-6, 2-6
2021-05-26vs Salt Lake Tennis-Sandack/CracroftWon 21
W#1 DoublesTerry Sidford / Sue Ann Kern vs Susan Sandack / Marilee Cracroft6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLynne Anderson / Denise Konrad vs Hannah Lee / Deanne Griffiths6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEileen Coccaro / Marie Jackson vs Nancy Sparrer / Cathy Philpot6-4, 7-6
2021-05-19vs Ivory Ridge-Patch/JohnsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Christian / Denise Konrad vs Jennifer Wells / Linda Fillmore6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMindy Halsey / Kim Persky vs Marilyn Patch / Sue Smith3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEileen Coccaro / Nancy Matz vs Elizabeth West / Gayle Waldron5-7, 6-7
2021-05-12vs Brighton High School-CarruthersLost 12
W#1 DoublesLynne Anderson / Denise Konrad vs Anne Gray / Laurie Summers4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEileen Coccaro / Sue Ann Kern vs Julie Berg / Crystal Richardson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarie Jackson / Jane Garrard vs Shelly Kemp / Summer Borla3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Denise Konrad
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Catherine Clark
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Nancy Matz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Sue Ann Kern
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Eileen Coccaro
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Jane Garrard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Christian
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kim Persky
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marie Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mindy Halsey
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sally Castleman
published
Terry Sidford
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Sidford + Catherine Clark3455% games+1.5% vs expected
Sue Ann Kern + Nancy Matz1639% games−9.3% vs expected
Terry Sidford + Sue Ann Kern224 matchesnot enough data
Denise Konrad + Sue Ann Kern224 matchesnot enough data
Denise Konrad + Catherine Clark134 matchesnot enough data
Mindy Halsey + Marie Jackson134 matchesnot enough data
Terry Sidford + Mindy Halsey123 matchesnot enough data
Sue Ann Kern + Jane Garrard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Konrad
34W–64L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Catherine Clark
40W–48L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Nancy Matz
48W–72L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.88
Sue Ann Kern
44W–70L career · 5 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
Eileen Coccaro
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jane Garrard
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Christian
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kim Persky
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marie Jackson
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mindy Halsey
28W–60L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sally Castleman
12W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Terry Sidford
28W–36L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.