Teams

Ivory Ridge-Patch/Johnson

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 7.0W

16 players · average NTRP 3.29 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-30vs South Jordan-Simmons/PaskinsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanee Roper / Kaylene Andrew vs Karen Rozsa / Lori Wilson4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChristine Adams / Sara Madsen vs Janice Stokes-Burns / Elaine Hansen1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesShirley Johnson / Jeanne Harrison vs Robin Simmons / Mindi Paskins0-6, 2-6
2021-06-23vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-Cox/WebbWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Wilson / Linda Fillmore vs Jennifer Webb / Yaeko Bryner6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKris McDougal / DeeAnna Barlow vs Vicki Cox / Jacki Joseph6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanee Roper / Sara Madsen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-16Split 11
L#2 DoublesKris McDougal / DeeAnna Barlow vs Karen Yocum / Dayna Stern2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTRACY PADGETT / Linda Fillmore vs Sara Bartlett / Kathy Carey6-3, 6-4
2021-06-09vs Salt Lake Tennis-Sandack/CracroftLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth West / Jeanne Harrison vs Hannah Lee / Deanne Griffiths7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShirley Johnson / Kaylene Andrew vs Deborah Warner / Deanna Mortensen2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Fillmore / Christine Adams vs Cindy Ostrowski / Marilee Cracroft6-2, 6-0
2021-05-26vs Brighton High School-CarruthersWon 10
W#2 DoublesTRACY PADGETT / Linda Fillmore vs Sherry Young / LaNece Andreason6-2, 6-3
2021-05-19vs Park City MARC-HalseySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Wells / Linda Fillmore vs Karen Christian / Denise Konrad4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Patch / Sue Smith vs Mindy Halsey / Kim Persky6-3, 6-3
2021-05-12vs South Jordan-Simmons/PaskinsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMarilyn Patch / Kaylene Andrew vs Charlotte Legg / Mindi Paskins2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesShirley Johnson / Elizabeth West vs Elaine Day / Lori Wilson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-05vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-Cox/WebbWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Wilson / Linda Fillmore vs Jennifer Webb / Kaye Moulding6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTRACY PADGETT / Jennifer Wells vs Vicki Cox / Jacki Joseph6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Linda Fillmore
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.53
Janee Roper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.27
Sara Madsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
DeeAnna Barlow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Kaylene Andrew
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Jennifer Wells
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
TRACY PADGETT
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Kris McDougal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Christine Adams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Gayle Waldron
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Elizabeth West
published 3
2.72
Shirley Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Marilyn Patch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jeanne Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Wilson
published
Sue Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shirley Johnson + Elizabeth West1443% games+4.4% vs expected
Gayle Waldron + Elizabeth West342553% games+0.5% vs expected
Karen Wilson + Linda Fillmore4258% games+0.5% vs expected
Shirley Johnson + Gayle Waldron2555% games−1.8% vs expected
Janee Roper + Sara Madsen222350% games−3.8% vs expected
Marilyn Patch + Jennifer Wells2340% games−4.3% vs expected
Jennifer Wells + Christine Adams1633% games−5.1% vs expected
Marilyn Patch + Shirley Johnson0634% games−8.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Fillmore
101W–63L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Janee Roper
146W–123L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.53
Sara Madsen
84W–72L career · 1 line in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
DeeAnna Barlow
40W–70L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Kaylene Andrew
48W–71L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
Jennifer Wells
64W–109L career · 2 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
TRACY PADGETT
105W–91L career · 3 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
Kris McDougal
30W–79L career · 2 lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Christine Adams
47W–73L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Gayle Waldron
148W–155L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Elizabeth West
73W–66L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shirley Johnson
75W–89L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Marilyn Patch
100W–140L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.71
Jeanne Harrison
9W–43L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Wilson
36W–21L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sue Smith
60W–16L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.