Teams

Samuell Grand/Findley W4.0

2023 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

21 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
4.20
Aubrey Findley
published 4.5
4.11
Liz Christensen
published 4.5
4.05
Janis Barbash
published
3.98
Ellen Oliver
published 4
3.94
Natalie Clarkson
published
3.89
Ha Tran
published 4
3.84
Lisa Buitron
published
3.82
Alexa Mallard
published 4
Dana Koerner
published 4
3.65
Diane Hashimoto
published 4
3.64
Danielle White
published 4
3.57
Michelle Hefner
published
3.51
3.45
Denelle Alexander
published 3.5
3.38
Amber Morefield
published 3.5
3.35
Sarah Hamlin
published
3.23
Aundi Henderson
published 3.5
3.12
Sherri Rejebian
published
Geraldine Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janis Barbash + Natalie Clarkson16078% games+15.8% vs expected
Aundi Henderson + Lisa Buitron7356% games+6.5% vs expected
Amber Morefield + Lisa Buitron5550% games−1.1% vs expected
Diane Hashimoto + Ha Tran10952% games−2.4% vs expected
Blaine Eschenburg + Denelle Alexander19856% games−2.6% vs expected
Michelle Hefner + Natalie Clarkson224 matchesnot enough data
Alexa Mallard + Aubrey Findley404 matchesnot enough data
Dana Koerner + Ellen Oliver213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexandra Northington
24W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Aubrey Findley
63W–34L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Liz Christensen
123W–44L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
Janis Barbash
43W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
4.05
4
Ellen Oliver
33W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.98
Natalie Clarkson
21W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Ha Tran
43W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.89
Lisa Buitron
19W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Alexa Mallard
24W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Dana Koerner
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Diane Hashimoto
30W–34L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Gina Paterno Villalobos
16W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Danielle White
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.64
Michelle Hefner
30W–40L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Blaine Eschenburg
34W–28L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Denelle Alexander
35W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Amber Morefield
35W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
Sarah Hamlin
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.35
3.5
Aundi Henderson
32W–28L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Sherri Rejebian
5W–22L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
Geraldine Brown
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.