Teams

Baker 3.5W 40s Th AM

2024 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesSusan Roach vs Jessica Navarro1-1
2024-05-02vs Robinson/Gingerich 3.5W 40s Th AMWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Dean / Susan Roach vs Gail Terrell / Christina Schulenklopper6-0, 6-1
2024-04-25vs Barnes/Lowman 3.5W 40s Th AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Clark / Susan Roach vs Amy Backus / Nancy Reece6-3, 6-3
2024-04-18vs Womack 3.5W 40s Thurs AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Clark / Susan Roach vs Martha Fogleman / Teresa Tolin6-2, 6-2
2024-04-16vs Clancy 3.5W 40s Thurs AMWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Roach / Cheryl Scott vs Debbie Clancy / Cameron Wannamaker7-6, 6-4
2024-04-04vs Yates 3.5W 40s Thurs AMWon 10
W#1 SinglesSusan Roach vs Rebecca Morrison6-2, 6-2
2024-03-14vs Womack 3.5W 40s Thurs AMWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Dean / Susan Roach vs Gracie Womack / Patti Morgan6-0, 6-2
2024-03-07vs Clancy 3.5W 40s Thurs AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Roach / Cheryl Scott vs Teresa Cruz / Jamie Stoffel4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Lindsay Olin
published
3.59
Lori Harrington
published
3.54
Susan Roach
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.48
Melissa Baker
published
3.47
Danielle Wright
published 3.5
3.42
Karen Lubeck Smith
published
3.38
Jenny Kemp
published
3.35
Rebecca Hartsough
published
3.35
Lesley Rossato
published
3.14
Mary Dean
published
Kelly Pryzwansky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Baker + Lori Harrington4353% games+3.5% vs expected
Jenny Kemp + Lori Harrington213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Olin
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Lori Harrington
47W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.59
Susan Roach
121W–42L career · 8 lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
3.54
Melissa Baker
35W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Danielle Wright
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Karen Lubeck Smith
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Jenny Kemp
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.38
Rebecca Hartsough
40W–34L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.35
Lesley Rossato
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.35
Mary Dean
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
Kelly Pryzwansky
15W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.