Teams

Wallace/18+/3.0/MXD/QTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Mixed 18 & Over · 3.0 Shrev

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesAugustine Rivera / Lauren Teepell vs Benjamin Israel / Marie Israel6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesClayton da Silva / Claire Cordell vs Nak Choi / Lynette Campisi3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesThaddaeus Wallace / Cindy Courtney vs Jay Mitchell / KELLY TOUPS6-1, 6-1
2025-06-03vs Griffin/18/3.0/MXD/QTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesClayton da Silva / Madeline Slack vs Austin Hedges / Holli Griffin6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNishyant Jani / Claire Cordell vs Erik Luttkus / Amanda Teague6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Hudson / Cindy Courtney vs Bill Sumner / Ally Howerter6-3, 6-2
2025-05-27vs McElveen/18/3.0/MXD/POTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAugustine Rivera / Madeline Slack vs Jason McElveen / Kristen McElveen6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNishyant Jani / Lori Johnson vs Jeffery Hebert / Katherine Hebert6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Hudson / Cindy Courtney vs Taro Digney / Meghan Slusher6-2, 6-1
2025-05-25vs Free/18/3.0/MXD/CTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAugustine Rivera / Lori Johnson vs Timothy Walsh / Tanji Lyrse6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWilliam Teepell / Lauren Teepell vs Stephen Goebel / Karin Goebel6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Green / Tiffany Green vs Ty Mccutcheon / Christi White6-2, 6-4
2025-05-20vs Moore/18/3.0/MXD/BTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadeline Slack / Thaddaeus Wallace vs Shelly Boudreau / Vikram Chatrath6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTiffany Green / Robert Green vs Rhonda Wilson / Mike Moore6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLauren Teepell / William Teepell vs Lana Wray / William Coats2-6, 3-6
2025-05-13vs Thiels/18/3.0/MXD/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesNishyant Jani / Deniz Gungor vs Mary Ward / Lane McKenzie2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesClayton da Silva / Madeline Slack vs Aubree Bunyard / Chip Bunyard5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesClaire Cordell / Augustine Rivera vs Chelsea Pernici / Drew Witsman5-7, 3-6
2025-04-29vs Kwok-Roberts/18/3.0/MXD/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAugustine Rivera / Deniz Gungor vs Lee Daville / Sally Daville7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Hudson / Cindy Courtney vs Tracy Jones / Logan McConathy2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTiffany Green / Robert Green vs Caleb Kwok / Krysta Cyr3-6, 1-6
2025-04-22vs Stuart/18/3.0/MXD/POTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesNishyant Jani / Madeline Slack vs Rachael Deere / Parker Hebert6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClayton da Silva / Claire Cordell vs Amy Stafford / Paul Cavell3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Green / Tiffany Green vs Cole Sartin / Lauren Stanton0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-04-15vs Hooper/18/3.0/MXD/STCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesThaddaeus Wallace / Marianne Boston vs Daniel Moore / Sarah Hatfield0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLauren Teepell / William Teepell vs Jocelyn Hooper / M Landon Hooper6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCindy Courtney / Michael Hudson vs Zachary Gifford / Jennifer Octavi7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Clayton da Silva
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Michael Hudson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Augustine Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.95
Thaddaeus Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Cindy Courtney
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.91
Madeline Slack
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.80
Lauren Teepell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Deniz Gungor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Marianne Boston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Claire Cordell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Nishyant Jani
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tiffany Green
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
William Teepell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Teepell + William Teepell3453% gamesnot enough data
Michael Hudson + Cindy Courtney314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Clayton da Silva
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Michael Hudson
18W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Augustine Rivera
16W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Thaddaeus Wallace
32W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Cindy Courtney
25W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Madeline Slack
38W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91
Lauren Teepell
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Deniz Gungor
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Marianne Boston
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
2.5
Claire Cordell
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Nishyant Jani
11W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Green
14W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Teepell
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.