Teams

McElveen/18/3.0/MXD/POTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Mixed 18 & Over · 3.0 Shrev

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-03vs Moore/18/3.0/MXD/BTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesClay Simonton / Amanda Middlebrook vs William Coats / April Moore6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRaymond Jarvis / Kelly Schmidt vs Zachary Shadinger / Amanda Hale2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Gordon / Meghan Slusher vs Mike Moore / Elisha Coats6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-29vs Kwok-Roberts/18/3.0/MXD/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Gordon / Kelly Clayton vs Katherine Roberts / Brannigan Bissell1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJason McElveen / Amanda Middlebrook vs Tracy Jones / Isaac Thomas3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesClay Simonton / Parisa Zamani vs Brooke Romero / Brodie Romero3-6, 2-6
2025-05-27vs Wallace/18+/3.0/MXD/QTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJason McElveen / Kristen McElveen vs Augustine Rivera / Madeline Slack4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeffery Hebert / Katherine Hebert vs Nishyant Jani / Lori Johnson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTaro Digney / Meghan Slusher vs Michael Hudson / Cindy Courtney2-6, 1-6
2025-05-22vs Stuart/18/3.0/MXD/POTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesTaro Digney / Parisa Zamani vs Amy Stafford / Keith Knox6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClay Simonton / Kelly Schmidt vs Rebecca Graham / Matt Chandler2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJeffery Hebert / Katherine Hebert vs Jared Mourad / Mandi Little3-6, 6-7
2025-05-13vs Mitchell/Armstrong/18/3.0/MXD/POTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesClay Simonton / Karen Hardtner vs Nak Choi / Kimberly Arizmendi1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMyles Roberts / Katherine Roberts vs Byron Landon / MLiss Sella1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTaro Digney / Meghan Slusher vs Kevin Flood / Lindsey Cotton4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-22vs Griffin/18/3.0/MXD/QTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeghan Slusher / Clay Simonton vs Austin Hedges / Amanda Teague3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Hardtner / Taro Digney vs Chris Dunn / Paul Singh2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Schmidt / Raymond Jarvis vs Bill Sumner / Tammy Rhodes6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Katherine Hebert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Jason McElveen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Myles Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Parisa Zamani
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Kelly Clayton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Karen Hardtner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Raymond Jarvis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Kristen McElveen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Meghan Slusher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.59
Jeffery Hebert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
Amanda Middlebrook
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Taro Digney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.54
Paul Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.45
Clay Simonton
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.28
Jason Middlebrook
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.24
Kelly Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason McElveen + Kristen McElveen2444% gamesnot enough data
Karen Hardtner + Clay Simonton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Hebert
16W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Jason McElveen
14W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Myles Roberts
19W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Parisa Zamani
25W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Kelly Clayton
20W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Karen Hardtner
16W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Raymond Jarvis
9W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Kristen McElveen
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
2.65
Meghan Slusher
34W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%22%78%
2.61
Jeffery Hebert
11W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
2.59
3
Amanda Middlebrook
12W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
2.58
Taro Digney
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Paul Gordon
27W–25L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.54
3
Clay Simonton
9W–27L career · 9 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.45
Jason Middlebrook
5W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.28
Kelly Schmidt
2W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.