Teams

CACI RED

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-14vs VCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarrie Bryan / Diana Zoeller vs Ashley Franklin / Seanna Mulligan7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGeorgina Swales / Kristen Arsenault vs Elizabeth Quinn / Karen Blach2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSherri Hartman / Joby Koren vs Patti Akright / Amy Goodman7-5, 6-4
2023-06-07vs PCRK ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarrie Bryan / Diana Zoeller vs Kimberly Bevill / Elizabeth Anderson6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJoby Koren / Bernadette Rottschafer vs Lisa Franklin / Lori McDevitt6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKaren Eagleton / Sherri Hartman vs Carol Brohl / Jaime West5-7, 4-6
2023-05-31vs KNO SILVERWon 21
L#1 DoublesBernadette Rottschafer / Diane Wells vs Elizabeth Zenk / Shelley Chism3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCarrie Bryan / Joby Koren vs Kelly Lownsberry / Jane Webster6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaren Eagleton / Sherri Hartman vs Beth Cooper / Sonja Hayen7-5, 5-2
2023-05-24vs SS-LT REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault vs Suzanne Kwilman / Katy Adler7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGeorgina Swales / Jennifer Benson vs Maria Hush / Randy Eidler6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBernadette Rottschafer / Diana Zoeller vs Lynne Monnar / Fauna MacKillip3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-17vs PRC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault vs Sheila Curry / Heidi Pennink7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarrie Bryan / Joby Koren vs Henriette Nash / Lisa Rosen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Eagleton / Georgina Swales vs Carrie del Toro / Denise Debartolomeis6-1, 6-3
2023-05-10vs HRCA-N ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault vs Teresa Orr / Anita Kinder6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGeorgina Swales / Jennifer Benson vs Laura Hoganson / Shannon Porter7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarrie Bryan / Diana Zoeller vs Dana Anderson / Judy Monahan6-2, 6-2
2023-05-03vs HRCA-S BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault vs Marcy Butler / Melinda Shaffer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGeorgina Swales / Jennifer Benson vs Jacqueline Soderquist / Alison Cejka6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiane Wells / Bernadette Rottschafer vs Nancy Montini / Carol Parrish6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Melinda Conover
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Carrie Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Kristen Arsenault
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.27
Georgina Swales
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Bernadette Rottschafer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Diane Wells
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Jennifer Benson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Karen Eagleton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Diana Zoeller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.92
Joby Koren
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Sherri Hartman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Wells + Bernadette Rottschafer6261% games+9.2% vs expected
Joby Koren + Sherri Hartman5252% games+9.0% vs expected
Sherri Hartman + Karen Eagleton12358% games+7.9% vs expected
Georgina Swales + Karen Eagleton10458% games+5.2% vs expected
Georgina Swales + Melinda Conover4356% games+3.6% vs expected
Melinda Conover + Kristen Arsenault892859% games+2.6% vs expected
Bernadette Rottschafer + Melinda Conover6159% games+2.3% vs expected
Georgina Swales + Jennifer Benson421359% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melinda Conover
144W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Carrie Bryan
113W–78L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.38
Kristen Arsenault
116W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Georgina Swales
93W–37L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Bernadette Rottschafer
132W–87L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Diane Wells
45W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Benson
59W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Karen Eagleton
154W–121L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Diana Zoeller
52W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Joby Koren
57W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.92
Sherri Hartman
23W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.