Teams

HRCA-N ORANGE

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-14vs KNO SILVERWon 10
W#2 DoublesDana Anderson / Sally Heaton vs Beth Cooper / Kelly Lownsberry6-2, 6-4
2023-06-07vs PRC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnita Kinder / Lynn Hoppe vs Judy Jackson / Lisa Rosen0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDana Anderson / Laura Hoganson vs Linda Manassee Buell / Julie Hernandez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Beers / Sally Heaton vs Denise Debartolomeis / Carrie del Toro6-4, 7-5
2023-05-31vs HRCA-S BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnita Kinder / Shannon Porter vs Marcy Butler / Adele Rhinehart0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Hoganson / Kathleen Turner vs Alison Cejka / Melinda Shaffer7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2023-05-17vs SS-LT REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnita Kinder / Laura Hoganson vs Randy Eidler / Maria Hush4-6, 6-7
2023-05-10vs CACI REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesTeresa Orr / Anita Kinder vs Melinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Hoganson / Shannon Porter vs Georgina Swales / Jennifer Benson6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Shannon Porter
published
3.23
Beth Beers
published 3.5
3.13
Dana Anderson
published 3.5
3.10
Anita Kinder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Amy Tharp
published 3.5
2.90
Laura Hoganson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Sally Heaton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Judy Monahan
published
Kathleen Turner
published
Lynn Hoppe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Beers + Anita Kinder8458% games+6.4% vs expected
Sally Heaton + Beth Beers2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Porter
19W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Beth Beers
18W–20L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Dana Anderson
11W–30L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Anita Kinder
77W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Amy Tharp
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Laura Hoganson
50W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Sally Heaton
44W–82L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
Judy Monahan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Turner
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynn Hoppe
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.