Teams

SYR: Geary

2023 18&Over Mixed · 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-05vs PriceWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteve Brandt / Veronica Hotaling vs Eunhee Park / Weiqiang Dong6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiane Mantooth / James Hookway vs Nicole Christina / Richard Mourhess6-3, 6-3
2023-02-26vs PriceLost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Hookway / Diane Mantooth vs John Bonaccio / Nicole Anken6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2023-02-12vs PriceWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteve Brandt / Heidi Howard vs Nicole Christina / Philip Smith6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJames Hookway / Renee de Nevers vs Richard Price / Mary Hagemann6-3, 6-2
2023-02-05vs PriceWon 20
W#2 DoublesRichard Hall / Diane Mantooth vs Nicole Anken / Richard Price6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrea Elliott / James Hookway vs Richard Mourhess / Maiken Westergaard6-3, 6-0
2023-01-29vs PriceWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteve Brandt / Heidi Howard vs Greg May / Maiken Westergaard6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRenee de Nevers / William Murray vs Richard Mourhess / Mary Hagemann6-4, 6-2
2023-01-22vs PriceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSteve Brandt / Heidi Howard vs Weiqiang Dong / Maiken Westergaard6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesWilliam Murray / Allyson Mead vs Nicole Anken / Richard Price5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SYR: Geary6116512150
2Price1651634230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
James Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.27
Heidi Howard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Andrea Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Veronica Hotaling
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Kenneth Geary
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.10
Allyson Mead
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Steve Brandt
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.91
Diane Mantooth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Renee de Nevers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
James Hookway
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kim Waale
published
Richard Hall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
William Murray
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allyson Mead + William Murray5746% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Howard + Steve Brandt10070% gamesnot enough data
Allyson Mead + Kenneth Geary5347% gamesnot enough data
Veronica Hotaling + Steve Brandt5359% gamesnot enough data
Diane Mantooth + Steve Brandt5160% gamesnot enough data
Richard Hall + Allyson Mead1438% gamesnot enough data
Kenneth Geary + Veronica Hotaling3258% gamesnot enough data
Veronica Hotaling + James Burgess3260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Burgess
44W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Heidi Howard
101W–67L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Andrea Elliott
73W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Veronica Hotaling
109W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Kenneth Geary
59W–78L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%16%84%
3.14
3
Allyson Mead
54W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.10
Steve Brandt
72W–54L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Diane Mantooth
24W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
Renee de Nevers
39W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
2.62
James Hookway
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Waale
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Hall
47W–56L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
William Murray
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.