Teams

CROW CANYON CC 55AM7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Men 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-18vs PLEASANTON 55AM7.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Krueger / David Kutrosky vs James Cochrane / Galen Lowe6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-17vs PLEASANTON 55AM7.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Krueger / Craig Schumann vs James Cochrane / Michael Chan7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSteve Carmassi / Paul Krueger vs Kyle Jones / Carlo Guariento3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-27vs PLEASANTON 55AM7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteve Heninger / Dean Christman vs Patrick Chan / David Hood6-4, 7-5
2025-04-05vs PLEASANTON 55AM7.0AWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Riley / Steve Heninger vs David Hood / Benjamin Cha4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCraig Schumann / Paul Krueger vs Patrick Chan / Zhonghua Zheng6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesSteve Heninger / Craig Schumann vs Mark Vella / Edison Barco7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEdward Streegan / Paul Krueger vs Kyle Jones / Greg Backens4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Dennis Mcsweeney
published 4
3.51
Mike Canavan
published
3.30
Steve Heninger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Craig Schumann
published 3.5
3.22
Dean Christman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Steve Carmassi
published
3.17
Cliff Johnson
published 3.5
3.14
Paul Krueger
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
David Kutrosky
published 3.5
2.91
Perry Teevens
published
Gary Peer
published
Greg Sharkey
published
Randy Walsten
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dean Christman + Greg Sharkey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dennis Mcsweeney
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Mike Canavan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Steve Heninger
52W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Craig Schumann
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Dean Christman
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Steve Carmassi
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Cliff Johnson
39W–26L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Paul Krueger
46W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
David Kutrosky
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Perry Teevens
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Gary Peer
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Greg Sharkey
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Randy Walsten
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.