Teams

PLEASANTON 55AM7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Men 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-25vs MERVYN MORRIS PK 55AM7.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Cha / John Henshaw vs David Diamond / Antonio Robles6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Massimo Sarubbi vs Jaime Pagmanua / Ronald Melles3-6, 1-6
2025-05-11vs LANEY TA/Encinal HS 55AM7.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Michael Lee vs Andreas Berner / ALEX S WHANG4-6, 5-7
2025-05-10vs SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 55AM7.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Eugene Sivadas vs Alan Tse / Andrew K Block3-6, 4-6
2025-04-26vs LANEY TA/Encinal HS 55AM7.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesJason Cohn / Benjamin Cha vs David Kardon / Rob Tuazon7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPete May / Benjamin Cha vs Jason Ehrlich / Tan Nguyen6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Jeff Gee vs Steve Owen / Randy del Sarto6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Jeff Gee vs Yisong Ye / Dennis Louie2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Jeff Gee vs Patrick Harshman / Nicholas Blanchard7-6, 6-4
2025-04-05vs CROW CANYON CC 55AM7.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Hood / Benjamin Cha vs John Riley / Steve Heninger6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Danny Miranda
published 4
3.67
Shuangxi Xu
published
3.37
Milton Gee
published
3.36
Benjamin Cha
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Kevin Katari
published
Brian Frisby
published 3.5
3.15
David Hood
published 3.5
3.13
Galen Lowe
published
2.99
Scott Zhang
published
2.98
David Takeuchi
published 3.5
2.97
Thomas Shou
published
James Cochrane
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roberto Factura
published
Zhonghua Zheng
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danny Miranda
35W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Shuangxi Xu
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Milton Gee
18W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Benjamin Cha
64W–60L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Kevin Katari
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Brian Frisby
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
David Hood
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Galen Lowe
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Scott Zhang
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
3.5
David Takeuchi
5W–17L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Thomas Shou
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
James Cochrane
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roberto Factura
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zhonghua Zheng
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.