Teams

PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Men 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-17vs MERVYN MORRIS PK 55AM7.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Bao / Alan Wong vs Dennis Black / Tan Nguyen6-2, 7-6
2025-05-04vs MERVYN MORRIS PK 55AM7.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeff Gear / Daniel Bao vs Ken Fagel / Nick Halatsis7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesByron Bardy / William McCormack vs Nic Samonte / Christopher Picone3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Strain / Phillip Johnson vs Gil Fuentes / Wayne Spencer2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJosh Cohen / Ahmed Murad vs Mike Connerley / Christopher Hanford6-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesTom Betts / Jason Ehrlich vs Nic Samonte / Christopher Hanford6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDaniel Bao / Andrew Benzie vs Roland Ramos / Wayne Spencer3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Wax / Jan Davel vs Benito Feria / Gil Fuentes3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Byron Bardy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.29
Tom Betts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ahmed Murad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Andrew Benzie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Jan Davel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Daniel Bao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
David Wax
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
William McCormack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Paul McBrearty
published
2.83
Phillip Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Jonathan Degg
published
2.74
Jon Corbett
published
Jason Ehrlich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Betts + Jan Davel1447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Byron Bardy
13W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Tom Betts
13W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Ahmed Murad
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Andrew Benzie
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jan Davel
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Daniel Bao
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
David Wax
0W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
William McCormack
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
Paul McBrearty
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
Phillip Johnson
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Jonathan Degg
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
Jon Corbett
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.74
Jason Ehrlich
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.