Teams

Northern: Net Assets

2021 55&Over Women · 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-02vs Secret ServiceLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela Case / Claire Rehfuss vs Karen Quinn / Liping Wang1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Davis / Susan Quine-Laurilliard vs Joyce Eggleston / Elly Barhydt4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDonna Arnold / Carrie Hoffman vs Cyndy Preiser / Karen Tan7-5, 6-2
2021-07-26vs Secret ServiceLost 03
L#1 DoublesClaire Rehfuss / Deborah Davis vs Angela Miczek / MaryBeth Hollinger3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Arnold / Maureen Roberts vs Cathy Griffin / Melissa Ann Arnold2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeverly Swimm / Lisa Sternlicht vs Elly Barhydt / Cyndy Preiser4-6, 1-6
2021-07-19vs Secret ServiceWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngela Case / Mary Bunch vs Angela Miczek / MaryBeth Hollinger6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBeverly Swimm / Lori McCaffrey vs Elly Barhydt / Karen Quinn6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGlenda Kelman / Maureen Roberts vs Melissa Ann Arnold / Cathy Griffin7-5, 7-6
2021-07-12vs Secret ServiceWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori McCaffrey / Beverly Swimm vs Karen Tan / Melissa Ann Arnold6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAngela Case / Mary Bunch vs Joyce Eggleston / Susan Nye6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Arnold / Maureen Roberts vs Angela Miczek / MaryBeth Hollinger1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-07-08vs Secret ServiceWon 21
W#1 DoublesGlenda Kelman / Carrie Hoffman vs Liping Wang / Cyndy Preiser7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Quine-Laurilliard / Lisa Sternlicht vs Joyce Eggleston / Melissa Ann Arnold4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeverly Swimm / Lori McCaffrey vs Karen Quinn / Karen Tan6-1, 6-2
2021-06-24vs Secret ServiceWon 21
L#1 DoublesGlenda Kelman / Carrie Hoffman vs Karen Quinn / Liping Wang6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Quine-Laurilliard / Claire Rehfuss vs Susan Nye / Cyndy Preiser6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBeverly Swimm / Lori McCaffrey vs Joyce Eggleston / Elly Barhydt6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Beverly Swimm
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Debra Ahola
published 4
3.75
Susan Quine-Laurilliard
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Carrie Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Deborah Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Angela Case
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Diane Hardy
published 3.5
3.23
Glenda Kelman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Donna Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Claire Rehfuss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Sternlicht
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lori McCaffrey
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Mary Bunch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Maureen Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Swimm + Lori McCaffrey13169% games+7.2% vs expected
Glenda Kelman + Carrie Hoffman9849% games+0.4% vs expected
Carrie Hoffman + Angela Case8553% games−2.0% vs expected
Glenda Kelman + Susan Quine-Laurilliard121746% games−6.7% vs expected
Donna Arnold + Maureen Roberts3646% gamesnot enough data
Susan Quine-Laurilliard + Carrie Hoffman3353% gamesnot enough data
Susan Quine-Laurilliard + Lori McCaffrey4166% gamesnot enough data
Susan Quine-Laurilliard + Angela Case1452% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beverly Swimm
122W–101L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Debra Ahola
16W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Susan Quine-Laurilliard
124W–133L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Carrie Hoffman
60W–49L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Deborah Davis
66W–113L career · 6 lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.46
4
Angela Case
144W–106L career · 3 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
3.44
3.5
Diane Hardy
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Glenda Kelman
59W–81L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Donna Arnold
54W–67L career · 3 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.12
Claire Rehfuss
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Sternlicht
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lori McCaffrey
118W–50L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Bunch
32W–51L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Maureen Roberts
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.