Teams

Hjelt 40s 4.0M Wed PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · MEN 4.0 40 & Over Wed PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-30vs Rhoten 40s 4.0M Wed PMWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmiel Rossabi / Kevin Thoma vs Enno de Vries / Richard Farrell7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJohn Kim / Chris Leggette vs Robert Wells / Jack Walsh6-4, 6-3
2025-04-23vs Redding/Sherwood 40s 4.0M Wed PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesKENNY GREGSON / Kevin Thoma vs Eric Biesecker / Art Fadde7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmiel Rossabi / Jeremy Madrazo vs Matthew Skeen / Joseph Speight2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJason Altmann / Christopher Bryce vs Peter Georges / Chris Keiner6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 40 & Over Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jason Altmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Chris Leggette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Kevin Thoma
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Jeremy Madrazo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
KENNY GREGSON
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Christopher Bryce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Andrew Hjelt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
E P Forehand
published 4
3.71
Amiel Rossabi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Roddy Akbari
published
3.56
Josh Ivester
published
Matthew Barbee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Thoma + KENNY GREGSON10264% games+7.6% vs expected
Kevin Thoma + Amiel Rossabi314 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Hjelt + Amiel Rossabi314 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Thoma + Christopher Bryce213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Altmann
27W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Chris Leggette
19W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
Kevin Thoma
34W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Jeremy Madrazo
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
KENNY GREGSON
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Christopher Bryce
19W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Andrew Hjelt
24W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
E P Forehand
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Amiel Rossabi
20W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
Roddy Akbari
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
Josh Ivester
25W–10L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
Matthew Barbee
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.