Teams

Grand slammers

2023 Washington D.C. Mixed 18 & Over · Washington D.C. Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.12 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-19vs Kevin AlexanderWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Mead / Lesley Wellener vs Scott Gelbman / Katherine Koleski6-4, 3-5
W#2 DoublesCandice Rininger / William Wray vs Segun Eubanks / Faustina Smith-Neil6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRichard Klimpl / Elizabeth Myers vs Shyrelle Eubanks / Justin Rose6-3, 6-0
2023-03-12vs Sweet SpotWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Phillips / Damian Wingate vs Sandipp Rou Perepu / Kim Daniels6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTara Jakubik / Jamil Abdur-Raoof vs Christopher Lewitzke / Carolina Posada6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Myers / Nathan Calem vs Veena Gopalakrishnan / Nick Fox5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-05vs RogersWon 21
L#1 DoublesKelsey Messonnier / William Wray vs Abhishek Saxena / Anita Wilson0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJamil Abdur-Raoof / Tara Jakubik vs Bryan Kay / Pascaline Sangosse7-6, 2-2
W#3 DoublesRichard Klimpl / Alexandra Phillips vs Barry Dickman / Carrie Alfalaij6-0, 6-3
2023-02-26vs Game TimeWon 21
L#1 DoublesJamil Abdur-Raoof / Tara Jakubik vs Abdoul Miloud Agbere / Tamara Durand3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Mead / Candice Rininger vs Skeeta Narciss / Curtis Derek Owens6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAbigail Arterburn / Perry Hong vs Eugene Spencer / Nicole White5-7, 5-1
2023-02-12vs Net AssetsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Phillips / Richard Klimpl vs Thomas Cyrnak / Layna Kelly2-6, 6-5
L#2 DoublesDamian Wingate / Candice Rininger vs Angel Amponsah / Frederic Colas6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJustin Dorsk / Kelsey Messonnier vs Demetrius Crawford / Liqing Zhang7-6, 6-1
2023-02-05vs Strokes of GeniusWon 30
W#1 DoublesJamil Abdur-Raoof / Tara Jakubik vs William Bates / Chelsea Thompson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJustin Dorsk / Kelsey Messonnier vs Randall Brater / Ami Chastain6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNathan Calem / Elizabeth Myers vs Roger Stanton / Sarah Saperstein6-3, 5-4
2023-01-22vs Anderson & AndersonLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Phillips / Brian Mead vs John Doe / Casey Keplinger7-5, 4-2
L#2 DoublesLesley Wellener / Damian Wingate vs Murugavel Chengalvarayan / Kay Bransford3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Myers / Perry Hong vs Leonard Tetteh / Sharon Sabasteanski6-7, 2-6
2023-01-08vs BlairLost 12
L#1 DoublesJamil Abdur-Raoof / Tara Jakubik vs John Pennington / Kirah Yen5-7, 4-4
W#2 DoublesBrian Mead / Alexandra Phillips vs Richard Wang / Jenni Bae6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLesley Wellener / Richard Klimpl vs Gianna Kang / Benjamin Owsley3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Washington D.C. Mixed 18 & Over 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Grand slammers5316817185
2Rogers53121225204
3Strokes of Genius2661837254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Justin Dorsk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Alexandra Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.88
Candice Rininger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Kelsey Messonnier
published
3.82
Brian Mead
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Nathan Calem
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
William Wray
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Jamil Abdur-Raoof
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.42
Lesley Wellener
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Myers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Perry Hong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Klimpl
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tara Jakubik
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamil Abdur-Raoof + Tara Jakubik4354% games+6.1% vs expected
Alexandra Phillips + Brian Mead5163% gamesnot enough data
Lesley Wellener + Brian Mead404 matchesnot enough data
Richard Klimpl + Tara Jakubik314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Justin Dorsk
126W–83L career · 2 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.95
4
Alexandra Phillips
31W–11L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Candice Rininger
106W–90L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.88
Kelsey Messonnier
21W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Brian Mead
33W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.82
Nathan Calem
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.76
William Wray
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Jamil Abdur-Raoof
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Lesley Wellener
12W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.42
Elizabeth Myers
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Perry Hong
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Klimpl
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tara Jakubik
36W–19L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.