Teams

Rogers

2023 Washington D.C. Mixed 18 & Over · Washington D.C. Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-19vs Game TimeWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Gowin / David Todd vs Skeeta Narciss / Curtis Derek Owens4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarry Dickman / Cathy Huh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-12vs Strokes of GeniusSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Todd / Carrie Alfalaij vs Randall Brater / Jessica Somers5-7, 4-4
W#2 DoublesAbhishek Saxena / Julie Gowin vs Glen Medina / Chelsea Thompson6-2, 6-4
2023-03-05vs Grand slammersLost 12
W#1 DoublesAbhishek Saxena / Anita Wilson vs Kelsey Messonnier / William Wray6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBryan Kay / Pascaline Sangosse vs Jamil Abdur-Raoof / Tara Jakubik6-7, 2-2
L#3 DoublesBarry Dickman / Carrie Alfalaij vs Richard Klimpl / Alexandra Phillips0-6, 3-6
2023-02-26vs Anderson & AndersonWon 21
W#1 DoublesAbhishek Saxena / Julie Gowin vs Casey Keplinger / Aravind Krishna7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Hanna / Charles Tellis vs Kelly Bohne / Jose Miguel Sacin3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBryan Kay / Cathy Huh vs Andrea Gevas / Leonard Tetteh6-2, 5-6
2023-02-12vs Kevin AlexanderWon 20
W#1 DoublesCathy Huh / David Todd vs Sean Davis / Grey Coker7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesScott Washow / Jennifer Hanna vs Justin Rose / Faustina Smith-Neil6-2, 6-2
2023-02-05vs BlairSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBryan Kay / Anita Wilson vs Sunmin Kim / CHRISTOPHER AMOSS6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAbhishek Saxena / Cathy Huh vs David Tong / Caitlin Young1-6, 2-6
2023-01-29vs Sweet SpotWon 20
W#1 DoublesWendy Beale / Charles Tellis vs Tim Huber / Loan Nguyen6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAbhishek Saxena / Julie Gowin vs Kevin Chiong / Jennifer Davis6-3, 6-3
2023-01-08vs Net AssetsLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Washow / Wendy Beale vs Helen Hale / Thomas Cyrnak7-6, 2-5
L#2 DoublesJulie Gowin / Elliot Rogers vs Layna Kelly / Marvin Martinez4-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesPascaline Sangosse / Barry Dickman vs Anne Polino / Akash Agrawal5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Washington D.C. Mixed 18 & Over 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Grand slammers5316817185
2Rogers53121225204
3Strokes of Genius2661837254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Charles Tellis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Scott Washow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.99
Bryan Kay
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
David Todd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Julie Gowin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Carrie Alfalaij
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Cathy Huh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Anita Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Abhishek Saxena
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.62
Barry Dickman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Wendy Beale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Elliot Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jennifer Hanna
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pascaline Sangosse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Todd + Anita Wilson4163% games+18.6% vs expected
Charles Tellis + Cathy Huh314 matchesnot enough data
Bryan Kay + Anita Wilson314 matchesnot enough data
Scott Washow + Wendy Beale213 matchesnot enough data
Abhishek Saxena + Cathy Huh213 matchesnot enough data
Abhishek Saxena + Julie Gowin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charles Tellis
92W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Scott Washow
112W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
4.12
4
Bryan Kay
68W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
David Todd
58W–28L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Julie Gowin
227W–211L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Carrie Alfalaij
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Cathy Huh
208W–128L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Anita Wilson
33W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Abhishek Saxena
25W–11L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Barry Dickman
90W–123L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Wendy Beale
315W–201L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Elliot Rogers
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
Jennifer Hanna
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Pascaline Sangosse
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.