← Teams

THPRD-Lee

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Jill Sather
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Karen Dellinger
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
Sharon Kim-Geib
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.56
Hong Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Donna Kennish
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.52
Flor Harrigan
published 4
3.52
Ellen Bowman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.36
Rie Sasakawa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Results8 ties
2024-11-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Dellinger / Flor Harrigan vs Dayna Porter / Lisa Provost6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJill Sather / Ellen Bowman vs Rochelle Pluymers / Tina Clancy6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRie Sasakawa / Sharon Kim-Geib vs Kelly Asbridge / Michele Beaman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-16Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Dellinger / Rie Sasakawa vs Deborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Sather / Ellen Bowman vs Becky Rey / Vicki Blunt6-4, 7-6
2024-11-09Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesKaren Dellinger / Rie Sasakawa vs Cathryn Hansen / Katherine Kralj6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAngie Lee / Sharon Kim-Geib vs Crystal Bryant / Tami Oglesby6-3, 6-3
2024-11-03Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesAngie Lee / Sharon Kim-Geib vs Michaela Bancud / Jean Herbst2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Hansen / Rie Sasakawa vs Heidi Wilcox / Laura Luthi6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHong Jones / Flor Harrigan vs Susie Jansky / Sally Lovett6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-19Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJill Sather / Ellen Bowman vs Starlyn Corley / Karen McNairy6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesFlor Harrigan / Rie Sasakawa vs Debbie Tingey / Joan Major6-3, 6-3
2024-10-12Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJill Sather / Ellen Bowman vs Mary Elliott / Kathleen Goodfriend7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesFlor Harrigan / Rie Sasakawa vs Amy Alpern / Lisa Lyon6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Kennish / Hong Jones vs Christy Strange / Kirsten Holmes6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKaren Dellinger / Flor Harrigan vs Kathleen Budnick / Joelle Lewis6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAngie Lee / Sharon Kim-Geib vs Joan Major / Michele Heinrichson6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHong Jones / Julie Hansen vs Karen McNairy / Starlyn Corley6-4, 7-6
2024-09-08Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJill Sather / Ellen Bowman vs Rochelle Pluymers / Lorna Goth6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulie Hansen / Karen Dellinger vs Michele Beaman / Lynne Nieda6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngie Lee / Sharon Kim-Geib vs Dayna Porter / Tina Clancy6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jill Sather
45W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Karen Dellinger
141W–68L career
1%99%0%
3.74
4
Sharon Kim-Geib
76W–53L career
1%99%0%
3.72
4
Hong Jones
26W–50L career
23%77%0%
3.56
4
Donna Kennish
137W–120L career
23%77%0%
3.54
4
Flor Harrigan
80W–73L career
25%75%0%
3.52
3.5
Ellen Bowman
40W–94L career
0%76%24%
3.52
4
Rie Sasakawa
129W–122L career
75%25%0%
3.36

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.