Teams

Backhanded Compliments

2024 USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

19 players · average NTRP 3.47 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-18vs Mixed MarvelsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDanielle Lofgren / Adam Bridges vs Veeresh Gowdru Ramesh / Cathy Wood6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-11vs Win or BoozeWon 10
W#1 DoublesDanielle Lofgren / Adam Bridges vs Willie Lafrades / Dawn Lafrades6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-27vs Third sets a CharmLost 02
L#2 DoublesHarrison Cleveland / Cassie Horner vs Timothy Brown / Paige Brown3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrett Lofgren / Bailey Pohlman vs James Mertz / Zel Mertz2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-20vs VamosLost 01
L#3 DoublesCassie Horner / Dave Gopalakrishnan vs Mark Stillman / Tiffany Roberts5-7, 2-6
2024-04-14vs One Hit WondersLost 02
L#1 DoublesKarlie Braseth / Adam Bridges vs Joshua Cramer / Loren Cross1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBailey Pohlman / Brett Lofgren vs Diana Hornung / Henry Prendergast0-6, 4-6
2024-03-30vs Miss HitsLost 01
L#2 DoublesCassie Horner / Thierry Floch vs Caleb Roope / Evelyn Elwer3-6, 2-6
2024-03-23vs MSA 7.0 (Mas Serve Aces)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesHarrison Cleveland / Bailey Pohlman vs Jeffrey Pugsley / Sondra Power-Thornton4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStacey Walker / Michael Allen vs Jennifer Wilson / Jared Stein6-7, 4-6
2024-03-17vs Group TherapyLost 02
L#1 DoublesBailey Pohlman / Harrison Cleveland vs Chadd Cripe / Kimberly Stewart6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Allen / Sandra Gulley vs Jae Yu / Jennifer Small4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-03-10vs Have FunLost 01
L#3 DoublesAdam Bridges / Karlie Braseth vs Bill Fritz / Lisa della Badia1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Karlie Braseth
published 4
3.69
Harrison Cleveland
published
3.62
Danielle Lofgren
published 4
3.52
Thierry Floch
published
3.47
Stacey Walker
published 3.5
3.30
Brett Lofgren
published 3.5
3.28
ChaiHuat Chong
published 3.5
3.25
Adam Bridges
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Bailey Pohlman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Baerwald
published 3.5
3.14
Dave Gopalakrishnan
published 3.5
3.12
Veeresh Math
published 3.5
3.10
Danielle Stoddard
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.02
Sandra Gulley
published 3.5
2.92
John Rutten-Turner
published
2.79
Ginger Cummins
published 3
Cassie Horner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Conner Hall
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Michael Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Lofgren + Dave Gopalakrishnan3642% games−7.2% vs expected
Danielle Lofgren + Brett Lofgren0735% games−15.8% vs expected
Danielle Stoddard + John Rutten-Turner6848% gamesnot enough data
Karlie Braseth + John Rutten-Turner4450% gamesnot enough data
Karlie Braseth + Veeresh Math0737% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Baerwald + Thierry Floch5253% gamesnot enough data
Michael Allen + Danielle Lofgren2446% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Gulley + Brett Lofgren2343% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karlie Braseth
59W–49L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Harrison Cleveland
38W–48L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Danielle Lofgren
33W–58L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
3.62
Thierry Floch
73W–96L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Stacey Walker
72W–53L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Brett Lofgren
8W–38L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
ChaiHuat Chong
38W–98L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Adam Bridges
36W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Bailey Pohlman
0W–4L career · type M · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Baerwald
61W–88L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Dave Gopalakrishnan
56W–118L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Veeresh Math
145W–158L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Danielle Stoddard
23W–45L career · 7 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Sandra Gulley
57W–113L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
John Rutten-Turner
65W–77L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Ginger Cummins
64W–118L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Cassie Horner
24W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Conner Hall
10W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Allen
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.