Teams

MSA 7.0 (Mas Serve Aces)

2024 USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

23 players · average NTRP 3.56 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-18vs One Hit WondersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Pugsley / Glory Questad vs Kent Laverty / Diana Hornung6-0, 6-3
2024-04-27vs Here for the BeerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Rosellini / Glory Questad vs Mark Jewell / Jill Yost6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDouglas Salerno / Amy Salerno vs Heather Baird / Jacob Warwick4-6, 1-6
2024-04-20vs Mixed MarvelsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Simpson / Glory Questad vs Jen Hunter / Veeresh Gowdru Ramesh3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDouglas Salerno / Amy Salerno vs Brijean Brennan / Orlando Ciniglio1-6, 3-6
2024-04-14vs Deuces WildWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie McDonald / Andy Emerson vs Kelly Haskell / Greg Haskell7-5, 6-4
2024-04-13vs VamosLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Salerno / Richard English vs Mary Katayama / Bill Reil4-6, 0-6
2024-03-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Simpson / Glory Questad vs Indranil Roy / Heidi Stipp6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-03-16vs Third sets a CharmWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Pugsley / Glory Questad vs Micah Vogt / Mia Costa6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-03-10vs Guys & Dolls w/BallsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie McDonald / Andy Emerson vs Christeena Sevy / Ryan Cook7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Third sets a Charm112271230308
2Not My Fault85211845374
3Guys & Dolls w/Balls76211838321
4Win or Booze76211841362
5MSA 7.0 (Mas Serve Aces)76182148388
6Here for the Beer67182149393
7Vamos211152449365

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Jeffrey Pugsley
published 4
3.67
Joanne Cornwell
published 4
3.56
Bryan Dingel
published 4
3.52
3.48
Michael Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
John Rosellini
published 3.5
3.35
Douglas Salerno
published 3.5
3.31
Charles Novak
published 3.5
3.30
Jared Stein
published
3.28
Pepi Ursillo
published 3.5
3.26
Stephanie Churchman
published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Reynolds
published 3.5
3.22
Eileen Ursillo
published 3.5
3.20
Andy Emerson
published 3.5
3.11
Lora Bonser
published 3.5
2.95
Amy Salerno
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Jennifer Wilson
published
2.90
Nikki Reynolds
published 3
2.89
Valencia Bilyeu
published 3
2.82
Richard English
published
Glory Questad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Julie McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ryan McDonald
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Wilson + Jared Stein251953% games+4.3% vs expected
Sondra Power-Thornton + John Rosellini3453% games+2.1% vs expected
Bryan Dingel + Valencia Bilyeu242948% games+1.9% vs expected
Eileen Ursillo + Pepi Ursillo304347% games−1.2% vs expected
Stephanie Churchman + Andy Emerson9853% games−1.4% vs expected
Douglas Salerno + Amy Salerno101450% games−11.2% vs expected
Andrea Reynolds + Richard English1733% games−13.0% vs expected
Sondra Power-Thornton + Michael Simpson2643% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeffrey Pugsley
69W–56L career · type A · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Joanne Cornwell
174W–140L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Bryan Dingel
105W–134L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Sondra Power-Thornton
108W–90L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Michael Simpson
43W–49L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
John Rosellini
85W–82L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Douglas Salerno
111W–92L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Charles Novak
26W–53L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Jared Stein
80W–39L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Pepi Ursillo
101W–118L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Stephanie Churchman
136W–91L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Andrea Reynolds
84W–122L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Eileen Ursillo
133W–146L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Andy Emerson
116W–117L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Lora Bonser
117W–110L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Amy Salerno
10W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.95
Jennifer Wilson
85W–66L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.93
3
Nikki Reynolds
74W–67L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Valencia Bilyeu
145W–124L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
Richard English
23W–57L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.82
Glory Questad
43W–59L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie McDonald
18W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan McDonald
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.