Teams

Torres/Syverson

2024 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 MEN

15 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-12vs Farrell/Birch - WBL AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesLiam Gillespie / Brian Reidinger vs Matthew Knutson / Kristopher Birch7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-11-28vs Smyth: Minnesota Slice 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Matt Woelfel vs Drew Maione / Jared Braegelmann6-3, 7-5
2023-11-21vs Gramins 18+ ES24Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Ruben Suare vs Del Bauers / Derick Dehmer7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Liam Gillespie vs Jon Benowitz / David Hoffman4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Liam Gillespie vs Jonathan Hawkinson / Jason Bednar4-6, 3-6
2023-10-17vs Farrell/Birch - WBL AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Luke Jordan vs Nicholas Fisher / Nicholas Oris3-6, 0-6
2023-10-10vs Jilek/Elfstrum 18+ ESWon 10
W#2 DoublesLiam Gillespie / Brian Reidinger vs Robert Wyly / Alan Stratton6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Ben Peters
published 4.5
4.03
Luke Jordan
published
3.80
Dan Westerhaus
published 4
Adam Soffer
published 4
3.73
Brian Reidinger
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.70
Juraj Huska
published
3.66
Otto Sanchez
published
3.65
Bradley Simon
published 4
3.63
Kyle Syverson
published
3.61
Luis Laguna
published
3.34
Michael Torres
published
Liam Gillespie
published
Matt Woelfel
published
Ruben Suare
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liam Gillespie + Matt Woelfel134 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Syverson + Brian Reidinger033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ben Peters
9W–24L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
4.13
Luke Jordan
35W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Dan Westerhaus
17W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Adam Soffer
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Brian Reidinger
92W–176L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Juraj Huska
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Otto Sanchez
16W–41L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.66
4
Bradley Simon
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
Kyle Syverson
11W–33L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.63
Luis Laguna
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.61
Michael Torres
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
3.34
Liam Gillespie
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matt Woelfel
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nils Stefan Pettersson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ruben Suare
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.