Teams

TOC.Merck

2026 CTRL Mixed 40 & Over · Mixed 40 & Over 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-08-08vs PW.HaywardWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteven Harris / Jennifer Ferralli vs Micha Federico / Ariel Edery6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Malory / Olga Tiselsky vs Colin Hayward / Simone Hayward6-0, 4-3
W#3 DoublesDaniel Teachey / Adrienne Todd vs Brandon Bridgman / Sarah Burkey6-1, 6-3
2026-07-18vs LOCH.PeltWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Narula / Adrienne Todd vs Edward Bernier / Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteven Harris / Jennifer Ferralli vs Chris Chuang / Linda Chuang6-4, 6-1
2026-07-16Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Hungarter / Sarah Ganong vs Kyle Reynolds / Rebecca Reynolds3-6, 5-7
2026-07-11vs TOC.KimLost 02
L#2 DoublesScott Hudson / Jennifer Ferralli vs Stephen Fu / Tanya Barcinas5-1
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Hungarter / Katie Hungarter vs Ashutosh Chaudhari / Michelle Yates4-6, 2-6
2026-06-27vs TOC.StuttLost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Malory / Jennifer Ferralli vs David VanHook / Amy Strong6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Teachey / Olga Tiselsky vs NEALE STUTT / Zana Piric0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Hungarter / Katie Hungarter vs Mahesh Salian / Rebecca Jacobsen6-3, 6-1
2026-06-20vs TOC.LeahyWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaul Narula / Robyn Merck vs Vincent Revels / Jessica Revels6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Jabusch / Stephanie Jabusch vs Bulent Erman / Regina Davis6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesScott Hudson / Olga Tiselsky vs Scott Daniel / Pamela Godwin6-4, 6-2
2026-06-14vs TOC.JavalkarLost 01
L#2 DoublesKay Kajiwara / Jeffrey Hungarter vs Susan Fekete / Claude Ruffieux6-7, 0-6
2026-06-13vs TOC.LiWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Narula / Adrienne Todd vs Bo Zhang / Emily Yang6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJohn Jabusch / Stephanie Jabusch vs Xiang Gao / Lirong Zhao7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Hungarter / Katie Hungarter vs Sean Cheng / Lijun Chen0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-31vs NMAC.FishLost 01
L#3 DoublesKay Kajiwara / Jeffrey Hungarter vs Amanda Fish / ANUJ SHARMA4-6, 1-6
2026-05-30vs TOC.ClarkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Carley / Chris Malory vs Laura Moore / Steve Pigora5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRobyn Merck / Paul Narula vs Sarah Hall / Carlos Kim6-2, 6-3
2026-05-16vs TOC.HoldenLost 12
W#1 DoublesChris Malory / Lisa Carley vs Mark Goettsch / Keiko Fukuzawa6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPaul Narula / Robyn Merck vs Daniel Horowitz / Anh Vu6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Jabusch / Stephanie Jabusch vs Arun Kumar / Melissa Hill3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 40 & Over 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Jeffrey Hungarter
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.43
Daniel Teachey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Adrienne Todd
published 3.5
3.39
Paul Narula
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
Chris Malory
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Olga Tiselsky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
John Jabusch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Lisa Carley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Jennifer Ferralli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.88
Stephanie Jabusch
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.83
Robyn Merck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Katie Hungarter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Hungarter + Katie Hungarter5152% games+10.4% vs expected
Olga Tiselsky + Daniel Teachey224 matchesnot enough data
Robyn Merck + Paul Narula123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jeffrey Hungarter
48W–57L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Daniel Teachey
31W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Adrienne Todd
44W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Paul Narula
142W–108L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Chris Malory
74W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Olga Tiselsky
129W–135L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
John Jabusch
7W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
Lisa Carley
10W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Jennifer Ferralli
23W–69L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Stephanie Jabusch
25W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Robyn Merck
91W–131L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Katie Hungarter
39W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.