Teams

TOC.Leahy

2026 CTRL Mixed 40 & Over · Mixed 40 & Over 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-06vs TOC.KimLost 01
L#1 DoublesMonica Palmer / Michael Palmer vs Nishant Mohan / Terry Perrone1-6, 3-6
2026-07-18vs TOC.StuttSplit 11
L#2 DoublesShelly Jude / Bulent Erman vs Donna West / Ivan Andjelkovic1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPamela Godwin / Scott Daniel vs Rebecca Jacobsen / Ron Jacobsen6-2, 6-4
2026-06-27vs TOC.LiLost 02
L#1 DoublesShelly Jude / Jon Rodriguez vs Lusia Li / Bo Zhang4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Revels / Vincent Revels vs Sean Cheng / Lirong Zhao6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-20vs TOC.MerckSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVincent Revels / Jessica Revels vs Paul Narula / Robyn Merck4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesScott Daniel / Pamela Godwin vs Scott Hudson / Olga Tiselsky4-6, 2-6
2026-06-13vs TOC.ClarkLost 02
L#1 DoublesMonica Palmer / Michael Palmer vs Jennifer Hensley / Lou Hensley3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Revels / Vincent Revels vs Sarah Hall / Timothy Koves3-6, 3-6
2026-06-06vs TOC.HoldenLost 03
L#1 DoublesMonica Palmer / Michael Palmer vs Najia Cheema / Chip Pope2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesShelly Jude / Jon Rodriguez vs Anh Vu / Eduardo Delossantos3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Revels / Vincent Revels vs Melissa Hill / Steve Crell6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-05-30vs PW.HaywardWon 10
W#2 DoublesScott Daniel / Pamela Godwin vs Frank Bologa / Helen Bologa4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-16vs LOCH.PeltLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Palmer / Monica Palmer vs William K Rhodes / Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 40 & Over 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Regina Davis
published
3.13
Shelly Jude
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Monica Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Scott Daniel
published
2.89
Keely Williams
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.82
Jessica Revels
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Pamela Godwin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Jennifer Leahy
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Vincent Revels
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Regina Davis
36W–56L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Shelly Jude
135W–162L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Monica Palmer
15W–51L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Scott Daniel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Keely Williams
186W–157L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Jessica Revels
59W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Pamela Godwin
50W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Jennifer Leahy
4W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
Vincent Revels
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.