Teams

Bryan - RS Clay

2025 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-30vs Brown - PCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracey Mcclurd / Donna Madison vs Amanda Brown / Lisa Andresen4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Bryan / Emily Mattes vs Arron Cravatt / Wendy McCullar6-1, 6-1
2025-09-23vs Escambia/Tan/Trilevel4.0/3.5/3.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrooklyn Meadows / Tracey Mcclurd vs Shannon Schluter / Cherie Krohn2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Powell / Melanie Bell vs Dodi Stringfellow / Cherie Tan3-6, 0-6
2025-09-09vs Brown - PCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracey Mcclurd / Tonna Wheat vs Amanda Brown / Kateleigh Calloway4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-09-02vs Escambia/Tan/Trilevel4.0/3.5/3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesTanya Leigh Shaffer / Tonna Wheat vs KIMBERLY ANDREWS / Ive Marsach4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-26vs McElhany - PCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDonna Madison / Tonna Wheat vs Adele Dorion / Carly Russell3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBrooklyn Meadows / Melanie Bell vs Valerie Wilson / Kate Major7-5, 6-3
2025-08-19vs Brown - PCCLost 02
L#2 DoublesMary Bryan / Emily Mattes vs Lauren Anderson / Wendy McCullar2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTracey Mcclurd / Donna Madison vs Amanda Brown / Kateleigh Calloway3-6, 3-6
2025-08-12vs Escambia/Tan/Trilevel4.0/3.5/3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa M Robertson / Tanya Leigh Shaffer vs KIMBERLY ANDREWS / Abigail Nelson1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Tonna Wheat
published
3.65
Tanya Leigh Shaffer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Tracey Mcclurd
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Brooklyn Meadows
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Emily Mattes
published 3.5
3.45
Donna Madison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.30
Sue Nast
published
3.29
Melanie Bell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.24
Amatul Bean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Mary Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Reghan Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Katie Cooper-Bussell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Kadi Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Alicia Trawick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Julie Sowell
published
Sharon Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Trawick + Katie Cooper-Bussell4159% games+11.0% vs expected
Tanya Leigh Shaffer + Mary Bryan7361% gamesnot enough data
Tracey Mcclurd + Donna Madison3643% gamesnot enough data
Tracey Mcclurd + Mary Bryan044 matchesnot enough data
Amatul Bean + Reghan Robinson404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tonna Wheat
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.67
Tanya Leigh Shaffer
37W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.65
Tracey Mcclurd
63W–107L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Brooklyn Meadows
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Emily Mattes
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
4
Donna Madison
58W–72L career · 3 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.45
Sue Nast
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Melanie Bell
39W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Amatul Bean
23W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Mary Bryan
74W–123L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Reghan Robinson
33W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.15
Katie Cooper-Bussell
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Kadi Taylor
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Alicia Trawick
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
Julie Sowell
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Powell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.