Teams

McElhany - PCC

2025 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-07vs Bryan - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdele Dorion / Alexia Rycroft vs Lisa M Robertson / Tonna Wheat6-3, 6-1
2025-09-23vs Brown - PCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarly Russell / Adele Dorion vs Amanda Brown / Alycia Esmonde7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDenise Prindiville / Jill Gonzalez vs Arron Cravatt / Wendy McCullar6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-16vs Bryan - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesMandy Blair / Alexia Rycroft vs Lisa M Robertson / Tonna Wheat5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-09vs Escambia/Tan/Trilevel4.0/3.5/3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalie Mcelhany / Alexia Rycroft vs Abigail Nelson / KIMBERLY ANDREWS1-6, 2-6
2025-08-19vs Escambia/Tan/Trilevel4.0/3.5/3.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdele Dorion / Alexia Rycroft vs Cherie Krohn / Shannon Schluter6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Alexia Rycroft
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Adele Dorion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Carly Russell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Natalie Mcelhany
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Denise Prindiville
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Jena Wise
published
3.34
Jill Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Grace Harvey
published 3.5
3.32
Valerie Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
April Schweigert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Sara Boucher
published
Kate Major
published
Mallie Woodfin
published
Mandy Blair
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexia Rycroft
28W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4
Adele Dorion
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Mary Catherine Harper
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Carly Russell
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Mcelhany
29W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
Denise Prindiville
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Jena Wise
38W–96L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Jill Gonzalez
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Grace Harvey
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Valerie Wilson
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
April Schweigert
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sara Boucher
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.93
Kate Major
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mallie Woodfin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mandy Blair
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.