Teams

Wynlakes-Stapper

2025 Spring USTA 55 & Over Day League-Montgomery · 4.0 Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-17vs MG Payne/Harvey 55s 4.0 daySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarla Crow / Laura McLemore vs Jenni Payne / Sandra Putz4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Eley / Susan Veres vs Christi DeZoort / Laura Harvey7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-01-27vs MG Payne/Harvey 55s 4.0 dayLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbie Daniel / Leah Leal vs Dabney Albritton / Laura Harvey1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Eley / Nora Cammack vs Ethel Holladay / Ann Osten4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Erin Bullington
published
3.74
Marla Crow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Barbi Gelabert
published 4
3.58
Carol Stapper
published 4
3.58
Laura McLemore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Leah Leal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Susan Veres
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Debbie Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Lisa Eley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Nora Cammack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kimberly Mathews
published
Emily Newell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura McLemore + Leah Leal5158% games+3.5% vs expected
Laura McLemore + Marla Crow213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Eley + Susan Veres033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Bullington
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Marla Crow
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Barbi Gelabert
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Carol Stapper
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Laura McLemore
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.58
Leah Leal
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Susan Veres
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
4
Debbie Daniel
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Lisa Eley
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
Nora Cammack
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
Kimberly Mathews
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Emily Newell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.