Teams

MG Payne/Harvey 55s 4.0 day

2025 Spring USTA 55 & Over Day League-Montgomery · 4.0 Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-21vs Wynlakes-TelehanyWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Gerst / Jenni Payne vs Charlotte Henderson / Ellen Sharan6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristi DeZoort / Laura Harvey vs Carol Telehany / Laura Worthy6-3, 6-2
2025-03-17vs Wynlakes-StapperSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJenni Payne / Sandra Putz vs Marla Crow / Laura McLemore4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristi DeZoort / Laura Harvey vs Lisa Eley / Susan Veres5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-03vs Wynlakes-TelehanyLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Cook / Jennifer Davis vs Ellen Sharan / Darlene Skier4-6, 2-6
2025-02-24vs Wynlakes-StapperWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Davis / Sandra Putz vs Leah Leal / Lisa Eley6-1, 6-4
2025-02-03vs Wynlakes-TelehanyLost 01
L#2 DoublesEthel Holladay / Jennifer Davis vs Julie Brand / DEBBY THOMAS6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-01-27vs Wynlakes-StapperWon 20
W#1 DoublesDabney Albritton / Laura Harvey vs Debbie Daniel / Leah Leal6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEthel Holladay / Ann Osten vs Lisa Eley / Nora Cammack6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Leslie Davis
published
3.88
Dabney Albritton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Sandra Putz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Jenni Payne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Jennifer Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Christi DeZoort
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Katie Gerst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Ann Osten
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Ethel Holladay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marquita Cocke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Davis + Jenni Payne4256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Davis
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Dabney Albritton
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Sandra Putz
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Jenni Payne
39W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Jennifer Davis
66W–70L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Christi DeZoort
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Katie Gerst
33W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
4
Ann Osten
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Ethel Holladay
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Marquita Cocke
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.