Teams

GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Cisneros/EPTC#5

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.90 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMauricio Martinez / Jorge Chinolla vs Enrique Mirazo / Joseph Isaac6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-10-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesMauricio Martinez / Jorge Chinolla vs Scott Jones / Pedro Ibarra6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Jones/18&over/4.0M62281235317
2GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Cisneros/EPTC#562271335342
3GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Melendez/EPTC#153251533306
4GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Gandarilla/EPTC#353192146371
5GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Orozco/TW44211943342
6GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Mirazo/EPCC44202046373
7GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Kim/FB35192145355
8GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Dominguez/EPTC#426142656405
9GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Lopez/EPTC#21773368428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Armando Landa
usually #1 Singles 35%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.82
Alfredo Salas
usually #1 Singles 62%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 4
3.76
Armando Armendariz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Brandon Silverstein
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.28
Alejandro Contreras
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Eugenio Prado
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Ivan Ortiz
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Singles 39% · published
Javier Alvarado
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Jorge Chinolla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Luis Carbajal
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mauricio Cisneros
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Mauricio Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Omar Abbud
usually #1 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sebastian Acosta
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Victor Tapia
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Armando Armendariz + Armando Landa6450% games−9.0% vs expected
Omar Abbud + Mauricio Cisneros3452% gamesnot enough data
Omar Abbud + Sebastian Acosta5257% gamesnot enough data
Javier Alvarado + Mauricio Cisneros2542% gamesnot enough data
Mauricio Cisneros + Sebastian Acosta5256% gamesnot enough data
Victor Tapia + Mauricio Cisneros134 matchesnot enough data
Armando Armendariz + Alejandro Contreras213 matchesnot enough data
Victor Tapia + Sebastian Acosta303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Armando Landa
41W–24L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.98
4
Alfredo Salas
13W–4L career · 13 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Armando Armendariz
15W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Brandon Silverstein
77W–49L career · 14 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Alejandro Contreras
50W–42L career · 20 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Eugenio Prado
14W–10L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ivan Ortiz
23W–4L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Javier Alvarado
39W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jorge Chinolla
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Luis Carbajal
43W–20L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mauricio Cisneros
72W–64L career · 39 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mauricio Martinez
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Omar Abbud
57W–26L career · 25 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sebastian Acosta
23W–11L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victor Tapia
16W–16L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.