GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Orozco/TW

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEPTA

Schedule

Flight standings9 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/Jones/18&over/4.0M	6	2	28	12	35	317
2GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Cisneros/EPTC#5	6	2	27	13	35	342
3GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Melendez/EPTC#1	5	3	25	15	33	306
4GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Gandarilla/EPTC#3	5	3	19	21	46	371
5GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Orozco/TW	4	4	21	19	43	342
6GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Mirazo/EPCC	4	4	20	20	46	373
7GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Kim/FB	3	5	19	21	45	355
8GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Dominguez/EPTC#4	2	6	14	26	56	405
9GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Lopez/EPTC#2	1	7	7	33	68	428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77

Andre Martinez

usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #1 Singles 18% · published 4

3.55

Alex Garcia-Aguayo

usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3.5

3.54

Alex Trachter

usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4

3.31

Carlos de Regules

usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3.5

—

Elzie Johnson

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published —

—

Eric Swanson

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published —

—

Greg Garcia

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published —

—

Jared Jones

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published —

—

Jeffrey Tepsick

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Jesus Manuel Alvidrez

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published —

—

Jose Elias Berjes

usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 20% · published —

—

Luis Morales

usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Max Salazar

usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published —

—

Olac Fuentes

usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published —

—

Osvaldo Orozco

usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Trevor Rivera

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published —

—

Will Silverstein

usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published —

—

Yevgenko Makarov

usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alex Trachter + Max Salazar	5–4	48% games	+9.2% vs expected
Trevor Rivera + Carlos de Regules	7–2	55% games	−2.6% vs expected
Jeffrey Tepsick + Greg Garcia	2–7	47% games	−9.7% vs expected
Greg Garcia + Trevor Rivera	1–4	38% games	−14.1% vs expected
Trevor Rivera + Eric Swanson	12–9	50% games	not enough data
Carlos de Regules + Yevgenko Makarov	9–6	48% games	not enough data
Carlos de Regules + Max Salazar	4–3	55% games	not enough data
Alex Garcia-Aguayo + Andre Martinez	6–1	58% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Andre Martinez

15W–9L career · 15 lines in 2026

2%92%5%

3.77

3.5

Alex Garcia-Aguayo

13W–9L career · 14 lines in 2026

<1%36%64%

3.55

Alex Trachter

35W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026

39%61%<1%

3.54

3.5

Carlos de Regules

79W–83L career · 28 lines in 2026

1%90%8%

3.31

—

Elzie Johnson

124W–75L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Eric Swanson

58W–43L career · 22 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Greg Garcia

32W–51L career · 9 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jared Jones

41W–21L career · 9 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jeffrey Tepsick

22W–42L career · 7 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jesus Manuel Alvidrez

7W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jose Elias Berjes

16W–12L career · 15 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Luis Morales

53W–34L career · 11 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Max Salazar

21W–32L career · 7 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Olac Fuentes

39W–24L career · 17 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Osvaldo Orozco

39W–51L career · 15 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Trevor Rivera

39W–47L career · 21 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Will Silverstein

48W–27L career · 22 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Yevgenko Makarov

66W–60L career · 25 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.