Teams

2025 Holds

HOLD · HOLD-All players

20 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · HOLD-All players
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hold -Multiple000000
22025 Holds000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cheryl Mcgibbon
published 4
3.44
Sara Hopple
published
3.42
Dana Charette
published 3.5
3.41
Kim Athan
published
3.40
Katherine Curtin
published 4
3.38
Nicole Berman
published
3.30
Kimberly Gibbs
published
3.25
Shari Matusow
published
3.21
Ali Miller
published 3.5
3.15
Diane Falconer
published 3.5
3.12
Elizabeth Auch
published 3.5
2.84
Annie Haskel
published 3
2.84
Annemarie Rothe
published 3
2.71
Clodomiro Falcon
published 3
2.66
Annie Itkin
published 3
2.48
2.28
Kristen Sasso
published
Shannon Smith
published
Susan Ridenour
published
Terry Hole
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Curtin + Nicole Berman5363% games+19.7% vs expected
Shari Matusow + Shannon Smith5265% games+9.8% vs expected
Katherine Curtin + Kim Athan6167% games+6.0% vs expected
Shari Matusow + Nicole Berman291159% games+4.2% vs expected
Kim Athan + Dana Charette6453% games−0.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Auch + Kim Athan181651% games−2.0% vs expected
Diane Falconer + Kim Athan6649% games−3.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Auch + Dana Charette5253% games−10.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Mcgibbon
44W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Hopple
89W–78L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Dana Charette
94W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Kim Athan
161W–101L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
4
Katherine Curtin
165W–120L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Nicole Berman
220W–123L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
Kimberly Gibbs
75W–38L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.30
Shari Matusow
253W–134L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ali Miller
33W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Diane Falconer
155W–134L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Elizabeth Auch
162W–109L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.12
3
Annie Haskel
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Annemarie Rothe
119W–139L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Clodomiro Falcon
14W–53L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Annie Itkin
14W–26L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Donna Sargeantson
26W–55L career · type A · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Kristen Sasso
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.28
Shannon Smith
60W–32L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Ridenour
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Terry Hole
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.