Teams

3.5W Bounds

2024 Team Singles Tournament-NE · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-02-25vs 3.5W MartinWon 20
W#1 SinglesAnna Young vs Tammy Smalley6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDanielle Arnsdorff vs Cristi Ross6-0, 6-3
2024-02-24vs 3.5W WaldropWon 30
W#1 SinglesKate Bell vs Alicia Green6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDanielle Arnsdorff vs Kala Parker6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAnna Young vs Laura Hodges6-1, 6-2
2024-02-24vs 3.5W MartinWon 21
L#1 SinglesTracie Grammer vs Mandy Alford2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKate Bell vs Cristi Ross7-6, 7-5
W#3 SinglesKelly Young vs Tammy Smalley6-4, 6-4
2024-02-23vs 3.5W AdamsWon 30
W#1 SinglesKelly Young vs Susan Adams6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDanielle Arnsdorff vs Amanda Azlin6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAnna Young vs Diane Chenault6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
13.5W Bounds40102575
23.5W Martin228412116
33.5W Waldrop12361281
43.5W Adams030918111

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Kelly Young
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.54
Danielle Arnsdorff
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.40
Anna Young
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Kate Bell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.08
Elise Mcmasters
published 3.5
2.92
Tracie Grammer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Bell + Kelly Young15368% games+12.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Young
68W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Danielle Arnsdorff
17W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Anna Young
27W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Kate Bell
55W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Elise Mcmasters
56W–39L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Tracie Grammer
16W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.